Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Monte Cook on licensing (and 4E in general?)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 4165213" data-attributes="member: 48965"><p>My own thoughts on this issue are as follows...I really hope WotC has an open license. I feel it is similar to Microsoft vs. open source code. With 3e being open it allowed innovation, development and design to proceed at a faster pace than would have been possible with only WotC designers working on it ( not to mention it allowed WotC to find and hire from the best of the best). I also think that in the end, since 3e is open and so many are familiar with it...there is the possibility it could surpass later iterations of D&D.</p><p></p><p>Will it happen with 4th...Nope, this type of thing takes time, but the genie is out of the bottle and it's really hard to put it back in once released. I feel that WotC will, if they don't do so with 4th ed., have to go open in the future...especially since their new system is still an iteration of d20 and (theoretically) a 4th ed. clone or even improvement could be developed, and released at a cheaper price point than the 3 core rulebooks.</p><p></p><p>I personally wouldn't be surprised to see an actual decline in WotC's products as they will...</p><p></p><p>1. No longer be competing with others who may bring a better quality product (Paizo and adventures)</p><p></p><p>2. No longer have the enormous pool of talent steadily pushing the boundaries in design that 3e had.</p><p></p><p>3. Less variety in choices about how one wants to play D&D (I love Privateer Press's Iron Kingdoms and WotC just wasn't willing to push the boundaries when it came to setting design).</p><p></p><p>I have already decided to purchase the 4e core books...but that doesn't equate to supporting the game...yet. If variety or quality suffers I fully plan on going to Pathfinder. I actually think this is why Paizo may have made a good move in releasing their system after 4th ed. It gives people a chance to actually play 4e and determine it's flaws and bugs so that people can make a real choice...especially if there's no where to look for product except WotC.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Imaro, post: 4165213, member: 48965"] My own thoughts on this issue are as follows...I really hope WotC has an open license. I feel it is similar to Microsoft vs. open source code. With 3e being open it allowed innovation, development and design to proceed at a faster pace than would have been possible with only WotC designers working on it ( not to mention it allowed WotC to find and hire from the best of the best). I also think that in the end, since 3e is open and so many are familiar with it...there is the possibility it could surpass later iterations of D&D. Will it happen with 4th...Nope, this type of thing takes time, but the genie is out of the bottle and it's really hard to put it back in once released. I feel that WotC will, if they don't do so with 4th ed., have to go open in the future...especially since their new system is still an iteration of d20 and (theoretically) a 4th ed. clone or even improvement could be developed, and released at a cheaper price point than the 3 core rulebooks. I personally wouldn't be surprised to see an actual decline in WotC's products as they will... 1. No longer be competing with others who may bring a better quality product (Paizo and adventures) 2. No longer have the enormous pool of talent steadily pushing the boundaries in design that 3e had. 3. Less variety in choices about how one wants to play D&D (I love Privateer Press's Iron Kingdoms and WotC just wasn't willing to push the boundaries when it came to setting design). I have already decided to purchase the 4e core books...but that doesn't equate to supporting the game...yet. If variety or quality suffers I fully plan on going to Pathfinder. I actually think this is why Paizo may have made a good move in releasing their system after 4th ed. It gives people a chance to actually play 4e and determine it's flaws and bugs so that people can make a real choice...especially if there's no where to look for product except WotC. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Monte Cook on licensing (and 4E in general?)
Top