Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Hardhead" data-source="post: 997188" data-attributes="member: 2844">His list of the bad things, and my thoughts:I agree with this one.  I hate the idea of a horse now taking up a 10x10 square.I play with miniatures, so it doesn't bother me.  But I think there was already plenty of rules support for miniatures, so I don't see the need to make them more important.This is my least favorite change in 3.5 for exactly those reasons.  Bleh.  Sure, a Longsword for a human probably wouldn't be exactly like a Greatsword for a halfling.  But there are far worse realism sacrifices in D&D than this!  What's the point?I've only used the NPC tables once or twice, so I could care less.  OTOH, the one or two times I did use them were for NPCs I needed *right then*, not for character building (for that, I used PCGen).  The buffs probably were a bit too powerful.  I like the new buffs better, I think.Yeah.  And I doubt these feats will see hardly any play in my group.Holy crap!  Can we get a confirmation on this?  This makes classes like the Mystic Theurge arguably balanced.This has been a common complaint.  The new PrCs are uninteresting with laughable requirements and "pushing the envelope" level benefits.  I know I do.  And, personally, I'd prefer if they'd just left it out and let me buy $20 books.Sucks for the playtesters.  If there were any! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />Amazing they couldn't even get such basic errata included.What a surprising oversight.  The last six to eight months of books have gotten me to start wondering if WotC has any editors left at all.Eh.Eh.The price is high.</blockquote>

Verification