Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Monte Cook reviews 3.5
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Urbannen" data-source="post: 998463" data-attributes="member: 7643"><p><strong>My 2 cp</strong></p><p></p><p>I was very gung-ho about 3.5 because I see a lot of little problems with 3.0 that I would like changed. I like/can live with the vast majority of changes in 3.5. However, if 3.5 is what I read it is, I think I agree with a lot of Mr. Cook's criticisms. It doesn't seem that backwards compatibility is of utmost importance to this new edition, regardless of what WotC might say. It's not like they are just fixing some of the glaring problems that most players can already list by name, or adding some features to the problem classes. They are changing the basic functioning of many, many spells, spells being the bread and butter of the game. They are changing gnomes' favored class, fundamentally altering many existing characters. They are changing the weapons system in what seems will be a fairly drastic way. I like the current mechanic of weapon size - maybe the new system will be an improvement, but right now it seems a profound change that would only be appropriate under a totally new edition. I am also disturbed by some of the editing errors that Mr. Cook mentioned, mainly the omission of the fact that PrCs don't evoke XP penalties and the fact that the given magic items aren't priced under the revised system. </p><p></p><p>I understand that WotC is there to make money for Hasbro, but I think that there is a fair amout of manipulation going on. It seems that the PHB has been tweaked just profoundly enough that really you do have to have the new books. They do have a monopoly on this intellectual property after all. It is in their best interest to change the official d20 rules periodically to ensure continuous sales. A multitude of little tweaks and a few profound ones is a good formula that ensures continuous sales. People won't really be able to play the old version as a stand-alone à la 1st Edition because newer revisions will be so similar to older ones, and if they want to continue to play, they will want to get the newer version because of the profound changes. "That'll be 29.95 a piece, thank you for shopping at WotC, source for your "official" Dungeons & Dragons rules set. Oh, and make sure to visit our website to pick up all the latest errata, completely free of charge." </p><p></p><p>The criticism isn't really for the new edition's design and editorial team - nothing is perfect and they have a lot of different people to please. I do like a lot of the changes and would expect some of them in a 4th edition at the proper time. The criticism is for the corporate business practices, which right now feel kind of icky. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f621.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":mad:" title="Mad :mad:" data-smilie="4"data-shortname=":mad:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Urbannen, post: 998463, member: 7643"] [b]My 2 cp[/b] I was very gung-ho about 3.5 because I see a lot of little problems with 3.0 that I would like changed. I like/can live with the vast majority of changes in 3.5. However, if 3.5 is what I read it is, I think I agree with a lot of Mr. Cook's criticisms. It doesn't seem that backwards compatibility is of utmost importance to this new edition, regardless of what WotC might say. It's not like they are just fixing some of the glaring problems that most players can already list by name, or adding some features to the problem classes. They are changing the basic functioning of many, many spells, spells being the bread and butter of the game. They are changing gnomes' favored class, fundamentally altering many existing characters. They are changing the weapons system in what seems will be a fairly drastic way. I like the current mechanic of weapon size - maybe the new system will be an improvement, but right now it seems a profound change that would only be appropriate under a totally new edition. I am also disturbed by some of the editing errors that Mr. Cook mentioned, mainly the omission of the fact that PrCs don't evoke XP penalties and the fact that the given magic items aren't priced under the revised system. I understand that WotC is there to make money for Hasbro, but I think that there is a fair amout of manipulation going on. It seems that the PHB has been tweaked just profoundly enough that really you do have to have the new books. They do have a monopoly on this intellectual property after all. It is in their best interest to change the official d20 rules periodically to ensure continuous sales. A multitude of little tweaks and a few profound ones is a good formula that ensures continuous sales. People won't really be able to play the old version as a stand-alone à la 1st Edition because newer revisions will be so similar to older ones, and if they want to continue to play, they will want to get the newer version because of the profound changes. "That'll be 29.95 a piece, thank you for shopping at WotC, source for your "official" Dungeons & Dragons rules set. Oh, and make sure to visit our website to pick up all the latest errata, completely free of charge." The criticism isn't really for the new edition's design and editorial team - nothing is perfect and they have a lot of different people to please. I do like a lot of the changes and would expect some of them in a 4th edition at the proper time. The criticism is for the corporate business practices, which right now feel kind of icky. :mad: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Monte Cook reviews 3.5
Top