Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Beretta" data-source="post: 953183" data-attributes="member: 12260">I for one am glad for some of the 3.5E revisions. Some work needed to be done and it has - for the most part.What I don't want to see happen in WotC is an adoption of the "GW Syndrome". That being, with every new revision you improve the game's system significantly, but leave in some obviously 'broken' mechanisms that will need fixing (such as magic), or else design broken army books/codices (Chaos) so that you have a 'valid' reason to revise the core rules and its associated supplements every 5 years or so.Rinse and repeat, and it seems as though you have an ongoing cash-flow as long as new blood keeps entering the hobby.It seems to be the case with the splatbooks. They're all pretty ordinary, which is why I'll be looking over "The Complete Warrior" very carefully before I buy it.If D&D goes the way of GW, I'll be dropping this hobby faster than I did that one.That said, I like most of what I see in the core 3.5E, and I imagine I'll be able to get a lot more milage out of it if I can spot any bad mechanics (mystic theurge) and ban them.edit - spelling </blockquote>