Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="SpiralBound" data-source="post: 3040818" data-attributes="member: 8396">monte raises a bunch of really interesting points, however I wonder about how hs proposed changes would affect the &quot;feel&quot; of the spellcasters.&nbsp; On a certain level it seems like what he's suggesting would make the activity of playing a spellcaster be more akin to playing a fighter. Not just more equal in the pacing of their usage, but more like a fighter in how one would play them.&nbsp;&nbsp; I'm not so sure that this is a good thing.&nbsp; Playing a spellcaster shouldn't feel like playing a fighter.&nbsp; using your disiplines should feel the same as using your long bow or your great cleave ability.&nbsp; when it gets to that point, then why not just play a fighter?Now, some of his ideas are cool and I would like to try out a spellcaster structured as he describes to see if it indeed would feel like a fighter or if it would still feel distinctive as a spellcaster.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="SpiralBound, post: 3040818, member: 8396"] monte raises a bunch of really interesting points, however I wonder about how hs proposed changes would affect the "feel" of the spellcasters. On a certain level it seems like what he's suggesting would make the activity of playing a spellcaster be more akin to playing a fighter. Not just more equal in the pacing of their usage, but more like a fighter in how one would play them. I'm not so sure that this is a good thing. Playing a spellcaster shouldn't feel like playing a fighter. using your disiplines should feel the same as using your long bow or your great cleave ability. when it gets to that point, then why not just play a fighter? Now, some of his ideas are cool and I would like to try out a spellcaster structured as he describes to see if it indeed would feel like a fighter or if it would still feel distinctive as a spellcaster. [/QUOTE]

Verification