Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
More Movement In Combat!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MortalPlague" data-source="post: 5770789" data-attributes="member: 62721"><p>As a DM, I love to design combats that range all over the battlefield (Like <a href="http://www.jasonromein.ca/Map.jpg" target="_blank">this one</a>, for instance). It warms my heart when a battle starts in the tavern, spills into the street, makes its way along the docks and crashes into the smithy next door. 4E brought in some great tools to help with that, particularly with forced movement, but it kept a few things that really bogged down this sort of motion. So to see more mobility in combat, here's a few things to look at:</p><p></p><p>1) Opportunity Attacks - There's a <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/new-horizons/316205-anyone-loveaoos-oas.html" target="_blank">good thread</a> about this already, but like 'em or loathe 'em, they do stop people from moving around in combat.</p><p></p><p>2) Marking - Fighter marks in particular were a great touch, but they force fighters to stay next to their target. Then they force the target to stay next to the fighter. Some of the other tanks are better, but tanking is all about stopping movement. The other problem here is that when someone else hits the tank's target with a forced movement power, the optimal strategy is usually to 'leave him where he is'. There ought to be a better way.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Potential solutions? There's a few I've seen:</p><p></p><p>1) Skirmishing Bonuses - There's a number of monsters who gain extra dice of damage when they move more than 4 squares, or end their move more than 3 further, etc. If PCs had that rolled into their class, you'd <em>definitely</em> see movement in combat. Simple fix, and fun for the players.</p><p></p><p>2) Make Bull Rush Better - As written in 4E, you can only ever move someone on space with Bull Rush, and you don't deal damage. And you give up your attack to do it. If you could push a certain number of squares, or do it as a minor / move action, you'd see Bull Rush far more often. Or let a PC take a penalty on the attack to add it to the effect of that attack.</p><p></p><p>3) More Forced Movement - There's some, but there's room for more, especially on PC attacks. I'd love to see it as a bonus rider for a particularly good hit... (get 5 higher than the defense, and push 1 square).</p><p></p><p>4) Damage On Forced Movement - We'd see a lot more use of forced movement if you could slam enemies into things for damage, I suspect. Model it like falling damage, and you've got some awesome, cinematic, bad guys flying everywhere kind of combat.</p><p></p><p>Thoughts?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MortalPlague, post: 5770789, member: 62721"] As a DM, I love to design combats that range all over the battlefield (Like [URL="http://www.jasonromein.ca/Map.jpg"]this one[/URL], for instance). It warms my heart when a battle starts in the tavern, spills into the street, makes its way along the docks and crashes into the smithy next door. 4E brought in some great tools to help with that, particularly with forced movement, but it kept a few things that really bogged down this sort of motion. So to see more mobility in combat, here's a few things to look at: 1) Opportunity Attacks - There's a [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/new-horizons/316205-anyone-loveaoos-oas.html"]good thread[/URL] about this already, but like 'em or loathe 'em, they do stop people from moving around in combat. 2) Marking - Fighter marks in particular were a great touch, but they force fighters to stay next to their target. Then they force the target to stay next to the fighter. Some of the other tanks are better, but tanking is all about stopping movement. The other problem here is that when someone else hits the tank's target with a forced movement power, the optimal strategy is usually to 'leave him where he is'. There ought to be a better way. Potential solutions? There's a few I've seen: 1) Skirmishing Bonuses - There's a number of monsters who gain extra dice of damage when they move more than 4 squares, or end their move more than 3 further, etc. If PCs had that rolled into their class, you'd [i]definitely[/i] see movement in combat. Simple fix, and fun for the players. 2) Make Bull Rush Better - As written in 4E, you can only ever move someone on space with Bull Rush, and you don't deal damage. And you give up your attack to do it. If you could push a certain number of squares, or do it as a minor / move action, you'd see Bull Rush far more often. Or let a PC take a penalty on the attack to add it to the effect of that attack. 3) More Forced Movement - There's some, but there's room for more, especially on PC attacks. I'd love to see it as a bonus rider for a particularly good hit... (get 5 higher than the defense, and push 1 square). 4) Damage On Forced Movement - We'd see a lot more use of forced movement if you could slam enemies into things for damage, I suspect. Model it like falling damage, and you've got some awesome, cinematic, bad guys flying everywhere kind of combat. Thoughts? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
More Movement In Combat!
Top