Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
More "realistic" advancement in D&D?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Snoweel" data-source="post: 5040722" data-attributes="member: 4453"><p>I see levels as an abstraction.. kind of like hit points.</p><p></p><p>In the same way I'd narrate the 15th level fighter being overpowered by 100 villagers, I'd also narrate the same 15th level fighter slaughtering 10 of them (without rolling any dice because it's pointless).</p><p></p><p>I think the 4e combat system is designed to represent situations where the outcome is in some doubt. And I think it does that well, especially allowing weaker foes to be represented by level-appropriate minions, and stronger foes to be represented, in mechanical terms, by level-appropriate elites and solos.</p><p></p><p>I don't think levels are a concrete value intrinsic to NPCs; they are abstract and relative to the PCs.</p><p></p><p>D&D is not a simulation.</p><p></p><p>So while the PCs are absolutely 9th level (although their level is still an abstract value), I might decide that a group of opponents are nothing more absolute than 'low heroic tier' (a vague yet absolute statement of ability).</p><p></p><p>But because those opponents must have a level in order to generate combat staistics, they might be represented as 10th level minions - roughly equivalent to low heroic tier standard monsters.</p><p></p><p>If I had decided the enemies were 'high heroic tier', like the PCs, then I would just give them a level somewhere around the PCs level (9th).</p><p></p><p>Likewise, if I deem an NPC's power level to be 'mid paragon tier' (in absolute-yet-abstract terms), then in a fight against 9th level PCs I could represent this NPC as a 10th level elite. This is the same NPC who might be represented as a 15th level standard monster if he were to fight the PCs in a few levels' time.</p><p></p><p>Hell, the same guy might be a 6th level solo against a party of roughly that level. My point is that the values used in the combat system are designed to be abstract representations and they should always be relative to the PCs (who are the only ones who need an absolute level value at all times).</p><p></p><p>The statistics don't exist outside of combat between the PCs and NPCs. All that matters otherwise is a general idea of the NPCs' prowess, which needn't be any more detailed than a rough indication of which end of a particular tier (heroic-paragon-epic).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Snoweel, post: 5040722, member: 4453"] I see levels as an abstraction.. kind of like hit points. In the same way I'd narrate the 15th level fighter being overpowered by 100 villagers, I'd also narrate the same 15th level fighter slaughtering 10 of them (without rolling any dice because it's pointless). I think the 4e combat system is designed to represent situations where the outcome is in some doubt. And I think it does that well, especially allowing weaker foes to be represented by level-appropriate minions, and stronger foes to be represented, in mechanical terms, by level-appropriate elites and solos. I don't think levels are a concrete value intrinsic to NPCs; they are abstract and relative to the PCs. D&D is not a simulation. So while the PCs are absolutely 9th level (although their level is still an abstract value), I might decide that a group of opponents are nothing more absolute than 'low heroic tier' (a vague yet absolute statement of ability). But because those opponents must have a level in order to generate combat staistics, they might be represented as 10th level minions - roughly equivalent to low heroic tier standard monsters. If I had decided the enemies were 'high heroic tier', like the PCs, then I would just give them a level somewhere around the PCs level (9th). Likewise, if I deem an NPC's power level to be 'mid paragon tier' (in absolute-yet-abstract terms), then in a fight against 9th level PCs I could represent this NPC as a 10th level elite. This is the same NPC who might be represented as a 15th level standard monster if he were to fight the PCs in a few levels' time. Hell, the same guy might be a 6th level solo against a party of roughly that level. My point is that the values used in the combat system are designed to be abstract representations and they should always be relative to the PCs (who are the only ones who need an absolute level value at all times). The statistics don't exist outside of combat between the PCs and NPCs. All that matters otherwise is a general idea of the NPCs' prowess, which needn't be any more detailed than a rough indication of which end of a particular tier (heroic-paragon-epic). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
More "realistic" advancement in D&D?
Top