Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
More Rock/Paper/Scissors/Lizard/Spock in Combat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Majoru Oakheart" data-source="post: 6038247" data-attributes="member: 5143"><p>I hate to necro this thread, but I haven't been around for a while and was interested in responding to this.</p><p></p><p></p><p>You may be better than me at balancing encounters. I've never been able to create one that was balanced well enough that without the help of any ONE character in the group it is a TPK but with his/her help the party survives without a single casualty.</p><p></p><p>See above. I can't seem to balance that way. If I try to balance that way and even one member of the party has an off day and chooses poor strategy, someone decides to "roleplay" being scared(and thus cowers instead of attacking), or one player doesn't show up to the session, it causes the same effect as if the monster was immune to one players attacks.</p><p></p><p>I tend to balance encounters such that if any one member of the party is useless in some way the fight will still be fairly easy(in fact, I pretty much assume at least one party member will be useless...there's a couple people in my group who are likely to pick poor options every round of combat without one of the more tactical players telling them what to do).</p><p></p><p>The reason for this is because of the difference in power level between the weakest and strongest members of the party. The weakest are poorly created(having lower stats, worse feats, lower hitpoints) AND are poorly played tactically. These characters can do almost nothing during a battle and the party loses about 10% of its effectiveness.</p><p></p><p>But 2 out of the 5 will play characters that are worth about 35% of the parties power.</p><p></p><p>I don't want to cause a TPK...ever if I can help it. It isn't fun for me to start a new game. It also feels like I'm punishing the rest of the players for something that wasn't really their fault. One player decided to over specialize and now the rest of you have to die because of it. Otherwise that one player could just hose over the rest of the party simply by not showing up or not helping for a combat.</p><p></p><p>I agree completely. I think ultra-specialization needs to be discouraged...or at least equally effective to being a generalist. I don't think this can be solved simply with encounter design.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Majoru Oakheart, post: 6038247, member: 5143"] I hate to necro this thread, but I haven't been around for a while and was interested in responding to this. You may be better than me at balancing encounters. I've never been able to create one that was balanced well enough that without the help of any ONE character in the group it is a TPK but with his/her help the party survives without a single casualty. See above. I can't seem to balance that way. If I try to balance that way and even one member of the party has an off day and chooses poor strategy, someone decides to "roleplay" being scared(and thus cowers instead of attacking), or one player doesn't show up to the session, it causes the same effect as if the monster was immune to one players attacks. I tend to balance encounters such that if any one member of the party is useless in some way the fight will still be fairly easy(in fact, I pretty much assume at least one party member will be useless...there's a couple people in my group who are likely to pick poor options every round of combat without one of the more tactical players telling them what to do). The reason for this is because of the difference in power level between the weakest and strongest members of the party. The weakest are poorly created(having lower stats, worse feats, lower hitpoints) AND are poorly played tactically. These characters can do almost nothing during a battle and the party loses about 10% of its effectiveness. But 2 out of the 5 will play characters that are worth about 35% of the parties power. I don't want to cause a TPK...ever if I can help it. It isn't fun for me to start a new game. It also feels like I'm punishing the rest of the players for something that wasn't really their fault. One player decided to over specialize and now the rest of you have to die because of it. Otherwise that one player could just hose over the rest of the party simply by not showing up or not helping for a combat. I agree completely. I think ultra-specialization needs to be discouraged...or at least equally effective to being a generalist. I don't think this can be solved simply with encounter design. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
More Rock/Paper/Scissors/Lizard/Spock in Combat
Top