Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
more than one dodge buddy?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="elrobey" data-source="post: 2530117" data-attributes="member: 8725"><p>Thanee, you may be right, but I don't think it's clear-cut.</p><p></p><p>From the SRD, under general rules for feats:</p><p></p><p>"If a character has the same feat more than once, its benefits do not stack unless indicated otherwise in the description."</p><p></p><p>From the SRD, under the Dodge feat:</p><p></p><p>"... dodge bonuses stack with each other, unlike most other types of bonuses."</p><p></p><p>The benefit of the Dodge feat is to provide a dodge bonus. That benefit does not stack unless indicated otherwise in the description. But in this case, the description *does* indicate that the benefit stacks.</p><p></p><p>Now, I will grant you that for most feats that stack, the SRD is more clear, typically using language like "You can gain X multiple times. Its effects stack."</p><p></p><p>Meanwhile, the SRD also provides, for some feats, language like "You can gain Y multiple times. Its effects do not stack. Each time you take Y, it applies to a different Z."</p><p></p><p>YMMV, but I think the SRD has several reasonable interpretations:</p><p></p><p>1. You can take Dodge multiple times. Its effects stack, in that you designate one opponent only, and receive a dodge bonus of +1 per Dodge feat against that opponent.</p><p></p><p>2. You can take Dodge multiple times. Its effects do not stack. Each time you take Dodge, it applies to a different opponent.</p><p></p><p>3. You can take Dodge multiple times. Its effects stack, in that you may designate any number of opponents and allocate each +1 dodge bonus from each feat against the opponent(s) as you see fit.</p><p></p><p>4. You can't take Dodge more than once.</p><p></p><p>Personally, my interpretation is #3. You can go with 4 if you like, and we can agree to disagree. I don't think either interpretation is more defensible, purely as a matter of interpretation; it comes down to preference.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="elrobey, post: 2530117, member: 8725"] Thanee, you may be right, but I don't think it's clear-cut. From the SRD, under general rules for feats: "If a character has the same feat more than once, its benefits do not stack unless indicated otherwise in the description." From the SRD, under the Dodge feat: "... dodge bonuses stack with each other, unlike most other types of bonuses." The benefit of the Dodge feat is to provide a dodge bonus. That benefit does not stack unless indicated otherwise in the description. But in this case, the description *does* indicate that the benefit stacks. Now, I will grant you that for most feats that stack, the SRD is more clear, typically using language like "You can gain X multiple times. Its effects stack." Meanwhile, the SRD also provides, for some feats, language like "You can gain Y multiple times. Its effects do not stack. Each time you take Y, it applies to a different Z." YMMV, but I think the SRD has several reasonable interpretations: 1. You can take Dodge multiple times. Its effects stack, in that you designate one opponent only, and receive a dodge bonus of +1 per Dodge feat against that opponent. 2. You can take Dodge multiple times. Its effects do not stack. Each time you take Dodge, it applies to a different opponent. 3. You can take Dodge multiple times. Its effects stack, in that you may designate any number of opponents and allocate each +1 dodge bonus from each feat against the opponent(s) as you see fit. 4. You can't take Dodge more than once. Personally, my interpretation is #3. You can go with 4 if you like, and we can agree to disagree. I don't think either interpretation is more defensible, purely as a matter of interpretation; it comes down to preference. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
more than one dodge buddy?
Top