Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
more than one dodge buddy?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Patryn of Elvenshae" data-source="post: 2532989" data-attributes="member: 23094"><p>No, it's not plausible.</p><p></p><p>There are two possibilities.</p><p></p><p><strong>One:</strong> Every feat can be taken multiple times. The ones that have special language discussing what happens when you take it multiple times merely modify that rule.</p><p></p><p>For instance:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So, I can take Self-Sufficient multiple times, and each time I gain a +2 bonus to Heal and Survival checks (they're unnamed bonuses, and so they stack).</p><p></p><p>However, I can only take Skill Focus (Survival) once, and it provides an unnamed +3 bonus to Survival checks. If I want to take Skill Focus again, it needs to be in something other than Survival.</p><p></p><p><strong>Two:</strong> When a feat says in its Special line, "You can gain this feat multiple times," it is doing so because, as a general rule, you cannot take the same feat multiple times. Therefore, unless the feat specifies so, you cannot take it multiple times.</p><p></p><p>The problem with interpretation one is that it makes the first one (or two) sentence(s) of the Special line completely useless. Why should they call out "You may take this feat multiple times" if, in fact, that's the general case?</p><p></p><p>Under such a rules paradigm, Skill Focus's Special line would read:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It doesn't.</p><p></p><p>Moreover ...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Now, you'll notice that the particular table this is referring analogously to is not present in the SRD. That would be the table in the PHB which has listing of all the feats, those which can be taken multiple times marked by a specific footnote. You'll notice that most of the feats don't carry that footnote.</p><p></p><p>Feats may only be taken once unless it is specifically called out that they may be taken multiple times.</p><p></p><p>You interpretation not only is not "the best or only," it's not even valid.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Patryn of Elvenshae, post: 2532989, member: 23094"] No, it's not plausible. There are two possibilities. [b]One:[/b] Every feat can be taken multiple times. The ones that have special language discussing what happens when you take it multiple times merely modify that rule. For instance: So, I can take Self-Sufficient multiple times, and each time I gain a +2 bonus to Heal and Survival checks (they're unnamed bonuses, and so they stack). However, I can only take Skill Focus (Survival) once, and it provides an unnamed +3 bonus to Survival checks. If I want to take Skill Focus again, it needs to be in something other than Survival. [b]Two:[/b] When a feat says in its Special line, "You can gain this feat multiple times," it is doing so because, as a general rule, you cannot take the same feat multiple times. Therefore, unless the feat specifies so, you cannot take it multiple times. The problem with interpretation one is that it makes the first one (or two) sentence(s) of the Special line completely useless. Why should they call out "You may take this feat multiple times" if, in fact, that's the general case? Under such a rules paradigm, Skill Focus's Special line would read: It doesn't. Moreover ... Now, you'll notice that the particular table this is referring analogously to is not present in the SRD. That would be the table in the PHB which has listing of all the feats, those which can be taken multiple times marked by a specific footnote. You'll notice that most of the feats don't carry that footnote. Feats may only be taken once unless it is specifically called out that they may be taken multiple times. You interpretation not only is not "the best or only," it's not even valid. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
more than one dodge buddy?
Top