Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Gez" data-source="post: 809847" data-attributes="member: 1328">Possible. Still, the definitive SRD of the psionic prestige class is Bruce Cordell's redo of them. And of course, section 15 of the d20 SRD OGL don't mention ITCK as the section 15 of these two PDF documents do. IMO, this just mean that WotC would not hesitate to make a deal with authors of rule material they want to reprint, especially if said authors are former employee...Actually, considering the sorcerer is balanced assuming people play blasters (talk about shoehorning) but somewhat suck with another concept (utility sorcerer ? ain't possible; planeshifter sorcerer ? outside of a planescape campaign, not useful often enough; divination- or enchantment- centered sorcerer ? talk about getting oneself the shaft); I think he knows.But there was so much people ranting that being depleted of spells twice as fast as normal was evil and sinful and dirty and unnatural, they've decided to make sure that would not going to happen again.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Gez, post: 809847, member: 1328"] Possible. Still, the definitive SRD of the psionic prestige class is Bruce Cordell's redo of them. And of course, section 15 of the d20 SRD OGL don't mention ITCK as the section 15 of these two PDF documents do. IMO, this just mean that WotC would not hesitate to make a deal with authors of rule material they want to reprint, especially if said authors are former employee... Actually, considering the sorcerer is balanced assuming people play blasters (talk about shoehorning) but somewhat suck with another concept (utility sorcerer ? ain't possible; planeshifter sorcerer ? outside of a planescape campaign, not useful often enough; divination- or enchantment- centered sorcerer ? talk about getting oneself the shaft); I think he knows. But there was so much people ranting that being depleted of spells twice as fast as normal was evil and sinful and dirty and unnatural, they've decided to make sure that would not going to happen again. [/QUOTE]

Verification