Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Mortality Radio # 30: Ed Stark interview available...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kae'Yoss" data-source="post: 814127" data-attributes="member: 4134"><p>The way I see it the problem is not with the Ranger being not versatile enough (for he's really a very versatile class, and the additional skill points and a choice of fighting styles - be they only to or two hundred), but the mentality of some people. They want to weaken the ranger by not giving him the feats, when all they have to do is not use them. It's practically the same: he won't use those feats and will be a good choice of class nonetheless. But there's the powergamer's instinct in people who want to have their character every single power they have to be as powerful as possible. </p><p></p><p>If I don't want to use some thing, I don't do it. I'll choose a class for what useful stuff it will give me, for what will fit in my character concept, and not for what stuff it will have but I won't use.</p><p></p><p>I've played lots of characters with armor proficiency (heavy) who only use light armor (or maybe medium). I never had the urge to put that character in heavy armor, just because I don't want to "waste" that feat. (It's funny, though, that people are complaining that the armor proficiencies have to be bought with feats, in d20M. You can't satisfy everyone.)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You are aware that this action will upset other people, and is therefor just another of those ways that won't please everyone (and actually, it is a choice that will upset more than any other).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't really like that. Either every single class gets bonus feats with a special list (as in d20m), or the ranger stays with his Paths. They're an improvement over the single style they got. I won't disagree, however, with additional paths, if they aren't to much and don't cover every fighting style there is (for this is fighter territory). Put in another for polearms, maybe (I don't see a ranger with a shield, it doesn't really fit), and some that give him other powers (maybe one with spells, one with survival-type abilities).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>d20M Survival states DC 18 to avoid getting lost. I think that means ID (since it's not in the skill list). I'm almost positive they will do this in 3.5, too (ID was probably the single most useless skill and had no right to be a separate skill)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Hm... I think he will get the appropriate craft skill.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kae'Yoss, post: 814127, member: 4134"] The way I see it the problem is not with the Ranger being not versatile enough (for he's really a very versatile class, and the additional skill points and a choice of fighting styles - be they only to or two hundred), but the mentality of some people. They want to weaken the ranger by not giving him the feats, when all they have to do is not use them. It's practically the same: he won't use those feats and will be a good choice of class nonetheless. But there's the powergamer's instinct in people who want to have their character every single power they have to be as powerful as possible. If I don't want to use some thing, I don't do it. I'll choose a class for what useful stuff it will give me, for what will fit in my character concept, and not for what stuff it will have but I won't use. I've played lots of characters with armor proficiency (heavy) who only use light armor (or maybe medium). I never had the urge to put that character in heavy armor, just because I don't want to "waste" that feat. (It's funny, though, that people are complaining that the armor proficiencies have to be bought with feats, in d20M. You can't satisfy everyone.) You are aware that this action will upset other people, and is therefor just another of those ways that won't please everyone (and actually, it is a choice that will upset more than any other). I don't really like that. Either every single class gets bonus feats with a special list (as in d20m), or the ranger stays with his Paths. They're an improvement over the single style they got. I won't disagree, however, with additional paths, if they aren't to much and don't cover every fighting style there is (for this is fighter territory). Put in another for polearms, maybe (I don't see a ranger with a shield, it doesn't really fit), and some that give him other powers (maybe one with spells, one with survival-type abilities). d20M Survival states DC 18 to avoid getting lost. I think that means ID (since it's not in the skill list). I'm almost positive they will do this in 3.5, too (ID was probably the single most useless skill and had no right to be a separate skill) [B][/B] Hm... I think he will get the appropriate craft skill. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Mortality Radio # 30: Ed Stark interview available...
Top