Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="NewJeffCT" data-source="post: 1424810" data-attributes="member: 10784">OK, folks, I do not post in the House Rules forum too often, as our group basically has not really used any House Rules in our 3.0 and 3.5 campaigns.However, we are thinking about adding a few when I brought up what I thought was an unfair penalty if you want to be a DEX based swashbuckler type fighter.&nbsp; You have to take the Weapon Finesse feat if you want to be one of the 3 Musketeers, Legolas, Captain Blood, Zorro or Drizzt.&nbsp; However, if you want to be Conan, Lancelot, Wulfgar or similar, you do not have to do that.&nbsp; My proposal to my DM was that you get to choose at first level if you want to be a DEX or STR based fighter.&nbsp; He is thinking about it.&nbsp; (By the way, this would not affect my current character, a cleric from a peaceful religion.)That said, what are the most common House Rules out there?&nbsp; Is my proposal legitimate and does anybody out there do similar?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="NewJeffCT, post: 1424810, member: 10784"] OK, folks, I do not post in the House Rules forum too often, as our group basically has not really used any House Rules in our 3.0 and 3.5 campaigns. However, we are thinking about adding a few when I brought up what I thought was an unfair penalty if you want to be a DEX based swashbuckler type fighter. You have to take the Weapon Finesse feat if you want to be one of the 3 Musketeers, Legolas, Captain Blood, Zorro or Drizzt. However, if you want to be Conan, Lancelot, Wulfgar or similar, you do not have to do that. My proposal to my DM was that you get to choose at first level if you want to be a DEX or STR based fighter. He is thinking about it. (By the way, this would not affect my current character, a cleric from a peaceful religion.) That said, what are the most common House Rules out there? Is my proposal legitimate and does anybody out there do similar? [/QUOTE]

Verification