Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Most frustrating quirk of 5E?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Volund" data-source="post: 7536694" data-attributes="member: 6872597"><p>The VSM requirements for spellcasting are a quirk from the early days that just won't die. There are so many ways around this now that it's time to admit it should go away. Keep the material components that cost something, do away with the rest, and let casters cast spells if they can speak.</p><p></p><p>The basic rule is that you need a free hand to hold material components and make somatic gestures, but because in actual play this is really a pain to manage there are a bunch of other rules to neutralize this basic casting rule. </p><p>-- spells list material components that nobody pays attention to unless they cost GP, because any generic focus will do and everyone gets one as a graduation present after finishing basic caster training. Alternatively you can get a component pouch that has everything you need just like a Marshall Brodien magic kit. </p><p>-- You can make somatic gestures while using the same hand to hold the material component. The range of hand movements I can do while holding onto a staff is pretty limited, but whatever, it's a fantasy game with magic.</p><p>-- Clerics and paladins can put their holy symbol on their shield. Druids, who are also described as divine spellcasters, can't do the same thing with a druidic focus. A holy symbol can't be attached to a weapon, but nobody knows why. Seems like the gestures one could make while holding a shield could also be made while holding a mace or sword with a holy symbol attached.</p><p>-- Whatever clerics and paladins are doing with their hands while holding the shield doesn't work for arcane foci -- bards, EK's, rangers, AT's, and warlocks can't mount an arcane focus on a shield and get the same benefit, so...</p><p>-- Arcane casters can take the War Caster feat which deals with S but not M components. Personally, I let a PC who takes this feat also mount their arcane focus on their shield.</p><p>-- Bladelocks can take the improved pact weapon invocation so that their pact weapon can be their arcane focus. Wizards, for all their intelligence, can't figure out how to do this, not even Bladesingers. You could argue that the pact boon + invocation is special, but then we see that...</p><p>-- Sword Bards can also use a weapon as their arcane focus. Valor bards can't, even though with shield proficiency they have the greater need. </p><p>-- If all else fails, you can drop your weapon, cast a spell, and then pick it up again as a "free" interaction with your environment. Silly gamesmanship to get around a silly rule.</p><p></p><p>What a mess.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Volund, post: 7536694, member: 6872597"] The VSM requirements for spellcasting are a quirk from the early days that just won't die. There are so many ways around this now that it's time to admit it should go away. Keep the material components that cost something, do away with the rest, and let casters cast spells if they can speak. The basic rule is that you need a free hand to hold material components and make somatic gestures, but because in actual play this is really a pain to manage there are a bunch of other rules to neutralize this basic casting rule. -- spells list material components that nobody pays attention to unless they cost GP, because any generic focus will do and everyone gets one as a graduation present after finishing basic caster training. Alternatively you can get a component pouch that has everything you need just like a Marshall Brodien magic kit. -- You can make somatic gestures while using the same hand to hold the material component. The range of hand movements I can do while holding onto a staff is pretty limited, but whatever, it's a fantasy game with magic. -- Clerics and paladins can put their holy symbol on their shield. Druids, who are also described as divine spellcasters, can't do the same thing with a druidic focus. A holy symbol can't be attached to a weapon, but nobody knows why. Seems like the gestures one could make while holding a shield could also be made while holding a mace or sword with a holy symbol attached. -- Whatever clerics and paladins are doing with their hands while holding the shield doesn't work for arcane foci -- bards, EK's, rangers, AT's, and warlocks can't mount an arcane focus on a shield and get the same benefit, so... -- Arcane casters can take the War Caster feat which deals with S but not M components. Personally, I let a PC who takes this feat also mount their arcane focus on their shield. -- Bladelocks can take the improved pact weapon invocation so that their pact weapon can be their arcane focus. Wizards, for all their intelligence, can't figure out how to do this, not even Bladesingers. You could argue that the pact boon + invocation is special, but then we see that... -- Sword Bards can also use a weapon as their arcane focus. Valor bards can't, even though with shield proficiency they have the greater need. -- If all else fails, you can drop your weapon, cast a spell, and then pick it up again as a "free" interaction with your environment. Silly gamesmanship to get around a silly rule. What a mess. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Most frustrating quirk of 5E?
Top