Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Most Valued Attribute
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mal Malenkirk" data-source="post: 4654338" data-attributes="member: 834"><p>Most people seem to think like you. There were only 4 characters with con 10 out of 46 and as I said, no one dumped it.</p><p></p><p>There is a very simple logical reason for Constitution to be on average higher than other stats.</p><p></p><p>1 - If you are a from any melee (or close range) class, you need (or at least feel you need) a decent constitution as a matter of fact, wether or not you invest in STR. </p><p></p><p>2 - If you are never in melee, you typically don't need strenght. But you still need a decent fortitude! So you invest in constitution. </p><p></p><p>It follows that virually no one dumps constitution. Exotic classes such as the new sorcerer might end up with very low con on a common basis. After all, they stay out of range and have an incentive (If using Drgon Magic) to have a good str. This could lead to fairly common low con build.</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>Another important factor in selecting constitution score would be the campaign : A campaign that caters to the one fight working day paradigm favors low con. In a single fight, it's extremely hard to blow through more than 5 surge in one fight so all you lose with a sucky con is 2 to 6 hp. At high level, it is meaningless.</p><p></p><p>But if you are in a campaign where you commonly have 3 to 5 fights a day, no one ever dumps constitution! EVER! The difference between 8 and 12 in constitution is being fit or not on the last fight of the day.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mal Malenkirk, post: 4654338, member: 834"] Most people seem to think like you. There were only 4 characters with con 10 out of 46 and as I said, no one dumped it. There is a very simple logical reason for Constitution to be on average higher than other stats. 1 - If you are a from any melee (or close range) class, you need (or at least feel you need) a decent constitution as a matter of fact, wether or not you invest in STR. 2 - If you are never in melee, you typically don't need strenght. But you still need a decent fortitude! So you invest in constitution. It follows that virually no one dumps constitution. Exotic classes such as the new sorcerer might end up with very low con on a common basis. After all, they stay out of range and have an incentive (If using Drgon Magic) to have a good str. This could lead to fairly common low con build. --- Another important factor in selecting constitution score would be the campaign : A campaign that caters to the one fight working day paradigm favors low con. In a single fight, it's extremely hard to blow through more than 5 surge in one fight so all you lose with a sucky con is 2 to 6 hp. At high level, it is meaningless. But if you are in a campaign where you commonly have 3 to 5 fights a day, no one ever dumps constitution! EVER! The difference between 8 and 12 in constitution is being fit or not on the last fight of the day. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Most Valued Attribute
Top