Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Move Attack Move: Issues with The New Standard for Combat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 6281818" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>While the rules probably could have something added or removed to close or narrow this loophole... speaking personally as a DM who might eventually have to adjudicate this type of scenario, my instinct would be to say to myself "Okay... this is something the duergar <em>could</em> do right now by the rules, but it only is going to work because I saved time by rolling their initiative as a group, rather than rolling each one individually as I probably should have. So if I'm going to artificially have them all go at once... I need to artificially agree not to take advantage of that situation."</p><p></p><p>Now that being said... if I was to decide to actually roll each duergar's initiative separately, and their numbers all worked out that they still could pull this tactic off... at that point I might let them work the MAM corridor thing. Still kind of cheesy due to the "all combat is supposed to happen simultaneously" paradigm... but at least both sides cannot claim unfair advantage. They both rolled initiative individually, and they both have the opportunity to try this tactic out.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 6281818, member: 7006"] While the rules probably could have something added or removed to close or narrow this loophole... speaking personally as a DM who might eventually have to adjudicate this type of scenario, my instinct would be to say to myself "Okay... this is something the duergar [I]could[/I] do right now by the rules, but it only is going to work because I saved time by rolling their initiative as a group, rather than rolling each one individually as I probably should have. So if I'm going to artificially have them all go at once... I need to artificially agree not to take advantage of that situation." Now that being said... if I was to decide to actually roll each duergar's initiative separately, and their numbers all worked out that they still could pull this tactic off... at that point I might let them work the MAM corridor thing. Still kind of cheesy due to the "all combat is supposed to happen simultaneously" paradigm... but at least both sides cannot claim unfair advantage. They both rolled initiative individually, and they both have the opportunity to try this tactic out. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Move Attack Move: Issues with The New Standard for Combat
Top