Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Movies: Novel Adaptations That Failed To Keep True To The Novel
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 4463304" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>Just to save you a small bit of ribbing in the future - the word you want is probably "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_(fiction)" target="_blank">canon</a>". </p><p></p><p>To me: Which came first is not important. Canon is not important. Being true to the original is not particularly important. </p><p></p><p>Why? Because if I wanted the same thing as the book, I could <em>reread the book</em>, and have it be exactly canon and true to the original work. It'd save me the ticket money, and I can make cheaper and better popcorn at home. Even today, Hollywood cannot match my own imagination in terms of special effects, acting, or casting. The only reason I have to see a movie (or TV) adaptation of a book or comic is to see what is <em>different</em> from the original, but still good.</p><p></p><p>The folks who do Shakespeare understand this - each retelling is a little bit different, and that's the point. To find the things that you can change a little bit, to give a different spin or meaning to the work. Small variations, or things you can do better than anyone else did before you.</p><p></p><p>This goes double when you change the medium in the retelling - what works well in a series of novels does not necessarily work in a novella, or a graphic novel, or a TV series, or a movie. And times change, so that audiences change - what spoke to people in the 1980s does not necessarily speak the same way to people of the 2000s.</p><p></p><p><em>V for Vendetta</em> is a good example of this. It differs from the original work, but is (imho) still an excellent movie. Taken on it's own merits, without reading the original, I love it - I know this because I saw the movie before I read the comic. In some ways, I think the movie is better - Hugo Weaving's body language and ability to act <em>without seeing his face</em> got some things across that weren't possible in the still frames of the comic.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, that's my own take on it. Each of us goes to movies for different reasons, so YMMV.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 4463304, member: 177"] Just to save you a small bit of ribbing in the future - the word you want is probably "[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_(fiction)]canon[/url]". To me: Which came first is not important. Canon is not important. Being true to the original is not particularly important. Why? Because if I wanted the same thing as the book, I could [I]reread the book[/I], and have it be exactly canon and true to the original work. It'd save me the ticket money, and I can make cheaper and better popcorn at home. Even today, Hollywood cannot match my own imagination in terms of special effects, acting, or casting. The only reason I have to see a movie (or TV) adaptation of a book or comic is to see what is [i]different[/i] from the original, but still good. The folks who do Shakespeare understand this - each retelling is a little bit different, and that's the point. To find the things that you can change a little bit, to give a different spin or meaning to the work. Small variations, or things you can do better than anyone else did before you. This goes double when you change the medium in the retelling - what works well in a series of novels does not necessarily work in a novella, or a graphic novel, or a TV series, or a movie. And times change, so that audiences change - what spoke to people in the 1980s does not necessarily speak the same way to people of the 2000s. [i]V for Vendetta[/i] is a good example of this. It differs from the original work, but is (imho) still an excellent movie. Taken on it's own merits, without reading the original, I love it - I know this because I saw the movie before I read the comic. In some ways, I think the movie is better - Hugo Weaving's body language and ability to act [i]without seeing his face[/i] got some things across that weren't possible in the still frames of the comic. Anyway, that's my own take on it. Each of us goes to movies for different reasons, so YMMV. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Movies: Novel Adaptations That Failed To Keep True To The Novel
Top