Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Charlaquin" data-source="post: 8201866" data-attributes="member: 6779196">You are no longer hidden from an enemy as soon as it can see you. It's up to the DM to decide if an enemy can see you. Generally, I would rule that in a combat situation, you can be seen as long as you are in the enemy's line of sight and not heavily concealed or behind total cover, so you would be seen as soon as you leave the darkness. But, other DMs might rule otherwise, and the RAW supports them in doing so.The Skulker feat specifically allows you to remain hidden after missing with a ranged attack, so the implication I get from that is that you would not remain hidden if you:a.) hit or missed with a melee attackb.) hit with a ranged attackc.) missed with a ranged attack and did not have the Skulker feat.But again, it's explicitly up to the DM to decide the conditions for hiding, so a DM who ruled differently would be supported by RAW in doing so.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Charlaquin, post: 8201866, member: 6779196"] You are no longer hidden from an enemy as soon as it can see you. It's up to the DM to decide if an enemy can see you. Generally, I would rule that in a combat situation, you can be seen as long as you are in the enemy's line of sight and not heavily concealed or behind total cover, so you would be seen as soon as you leave the darkness. But, other DMs might rule otherwise, and the RAW supports them in doing so. The Skulker feat specifically allows you to remain hidden after missing with a ranged attack, so the implication I get from that is that you would not remain hidden if you: a.) hit or missed with a melee attack b.) hit with a ranged attack c.) missed with a ranged attack and did not have the Skulker feat. But again, it's explicitly up to the DM to decide the conditions for hiding, so a DM who ruled differently would be supported by RAW in doing so. [/QUOTE]

Verification