Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Treebore" data-source="post: 3737197" data-attributes="member: 10177">See, that is where we have a significant divergence in perspective. You look at the feat system as a way to define actions, so do I. However, you seem to accept the feat system in its "limiting" form. IE if you don't have the feat you can't do it. In C&C you can attempt any kind of action. I prefer the freedom for the player to think of anything, and they can attempt it if I think its within reason. Since I DMed 3E for almost 5 years my definition of "reasonable" has been greatly expanded.I probably would not like playing under a truly "old school" DM in C&C, because its likely their perspective of whats possible will be a lot narrower than mine. Heck, now 3E's perspective of what is possible is narrower than mine.</blockquote>