Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ourph" data-source="post: 3739722" data-attributes="member: 20239"><p>If we could leave the passive-aggressive hyperbole out of the discussion that would be great.  As I've said before, this isn't a discussion about style preferences or value judgements.  I'm just as capable of running a rules lite game with lots of DM adjudication and creative input as the next guy, if not moreso.  It seems strange to me that you keep insisting I'm wrong when I say C&C doesn't provide information on the mechanical effects of actions covered by feats in 3e and then pat yourself on the back for playing C&C and not needing those things "spelled out".  If the mechanical effects are not spelled out then you are either making them up yourself or borrowing them from another source, which is the point I've been making all along.</p></blockquote><p></p>