Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
MtG, D&D and Me TITLE NAME EDIT-The thread where Joe apparently offends everyone
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mlund" data-source="post: 4796276" data-attributes="member: 50304"><p>The only thing that really caught my attention in this threat was the idea that young people have suddenly abandoned non-fiction books in a disturbing fashion.</p><p></p><p>Frankly, I think the traditional non-fiction book isn't all it is cracked up to be. Looking at the terrible quality of screening that goes into <strong>academic text books</strong> and some <strong>peer-reviewed scientific journals</strong> I don't think having a 500-page hard-cover on a shelf somewhere is any assurance of quality research or the impartial delivery of facts. Most non-fiction content is still subject to "spin" by the author. Without a narrative and some prejudicial conclusions large works on non-fiction fail to compel readers. They wind up as reference texts.</p><p></p><p>Meanwhile the sorts of narrative non-fiction that make sales for popular consumption represent too much investment by the reader. It prejudices the reader to accept the positions asserted by the author because of the feelings of foolishness that would accompany realizing you just wasted $40 and 600 pages of reading on something akin to what sticks to the bottom of a can of cat litter. The idea of spending that time and money to become <strong>less</strong> informed is appalling, is it not?</p><p></p><p>The same thing plays out with so many terribly executed courses in history and social sciences at colleges and universities as well. The level of investment and social programming encourages dogmatism rather than critical thought and dissent.</p><p></p><p>Having more compact delivery of details (sans narrative, padded page counts, and expensive prices) cuts down on the level of investment without cutting into the body of factual knowledge. With less resources devoted to a single source or opinion that consumer has more resources available to "get a second opinion" on the topic at hand.</p><p></p><p>All that said, the same sort of single-channel "learning" with poor quality control can occur when people just try to grab everything in sound-bites off of a place like Wikipedia.org too.</p><p></p><p>- Marty Lund</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mlund, post: 4796276, member: 50304"] The only thing that really caught my attention in this threat was the idea that young people have suddenly abandoned non-fiction books in a disturbing fashion. Frankly, I think the traditional non-fiction book isn't all it is cracked up to be. Looking at the terrible quality of screening that goes into [B]academic text books[/B] and some [B]peer-reviewed scientific journals[/B] I don't think having a 500-page hard-cover on a shelf somewhere is any assurance of quality research or the impartial delivery of facts. Most non-fiction content is still subject to "spin" by the author. Without a narrative and some prejudicial conclusions large works on non-fiction fail to compel readers. They wind up as reference texts. Meanwhile the sorts of narrative non-fiction that make sales for popular consumption represent too much investment by the reader. It prejudices the reader to accept the positions asserted by the author because of the feelings of foolishness that would accompany realizing you just wasted $40 and 600 pages of reading on something akin to what sticks to the bottom of a can of cat litter. The idea of spending that time and money to become [B]less[/B] informed is appalling, is it not? The same thing plays out with so many terribly executed courses in history and social sciences at colleges and universities as well. The level of investment and social programming encourages dogmatism rather than critical thought and dissent. Having more compact delivery of details (sans narrative, padded page counts, and expensive prices) cuts down on the level of investment without cutting into the body of factual knowledge. With less resources devoted to a single source or opinion that consumer has more resources available to "get a second opinion" on the topic at hand. All that said, the same sort of single-channel "learning" with poor quality control can occur when people just try to grab everything in sound-bites off of a place like Wikipedia.org too. - Marty Lund [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
MtG, D&D and Me TITLE NAME EDIT-The thread where Joe apparently offends everyone
Top