Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="frankthedm" data-source="post: 4064053" data-attributes="member: 1164">Parents should count themselves lucky if that is the case. The Candyland name is more than big enough for an over hyped holiday box office release, with a deluge of obnoxious tie in merchandise. I can't see the suits letting the money get away by just a Direct to video release just because it would save parents the cost of extra tickets, gas, popcorn, toys and fast food on the way home since the kids will have to get the happy meal with their new favorite characters.Oh, and as a preemptive strike against those who say the property promotes bad eating habits, they can launch a splenda'ed out 'Low suger' candy line <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f621.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":mad:" title="Mad    :mad:"  data-smilie="4"data-shortname=":mad:" /> .  Just think, Upcharge once for the "Candyland name" :\ , Upcharge twice for it being 'Health conscious' <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused    :confused:"  data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /> .</blockquote>