Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Pergentile" data-source="post: 5568844" data-attributes="member: 6671368">When a storm card is cast, a replicate of it is put on the stack for each spell played before it, therefore, if it is replicated 3 times, there are a total of 4 copies on the stack that need to be countered.Nowhere in my post is it indicated that I do not.Want to respond now, instead of being presumptuous and condescending? I am pretty sure that is frowned upon on these boards.Edit: Lets add a hypothetical situation. a 4v4. One of the opponents is a counter-spell/controller, who only counter-spells until he can get out things that generate counter-spell effects without using his mana.I am the one who saves mana to try and drop a bomb as soon as possible. That leaves 3v3 actively fighting it out. I play dragonstrorm for twenty seven!! mana, and we will say I get six copies of it. He plays two counterpsells, and we will say, two counter-spell effects (a non-retarded counter-speller would realize the restriction of spells per turn, and would adjust play style to cover that weakness), and I get two dragons. Upon the next initiative (since I am last), that same guy puts both the dragons back into my hand for two more mana, and he still has... 25ish? more mana than me.This is accurate, yes?(Jeez, people on here can be so defensive. Learn to take criticism better, before you post something like this thread, and your feelings won't get hurt.)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Pergentile, post: 5568844, member: 6671368"] When a storm card is cast, a replicate of it is put on the stack for each spell played before it, therefore, if it is replicated 3 times, there are a total of 4 copies on the stack that need to be countered. Nowhere in my post is it indicated that I do not. Want to respond now, instead of being presumptuous and condescending? I am pretty sure that is frowned upon on these boards. Edit: Lets add a hypothetical situation. a 4v4. One of the opponents is a counter-spell/controller, who only counter-spells until he can get out things that generate counter-spell effects without using his mana. I am the one who saves mana to try and drop a bomb as soon as possible. That leaves 3v3 actively fighting it out. I play dragonstrorm for twenty seven!! mana, and we will say I get six copies of it. He plays two counterpsells, and we will say, two counter-spell effects (a non-retarded counter-speller would realize the restriction of spells per turn, and would adjust play style to cover that weakness), and I get two dragons. Upon the next initiative (since I am last), that same guy puts both the dragons back into my hand for two more mana, and he still has... 25ish? more mana than me. This is accurate, yes? (Jeez, people on here can be so defensive. Learn to take criticism better, before you post something like this thread, and your feelings won't get hurt.) [/QUOTE]

Verification