Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
MTV---Rembember when it was cool?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WizarDru" data-source="post: 2498565" data-attributes="member: 151"><p>I see what you're saying, and I agree...to a point. I think you undervalue the power of the video, particularly when they were new. I remember middle-school and high-school, and how many videos in and off themselves were a topic of conversation...especially when they were linked together, often as a story of sorts. And let's not forget, MTv does still show videos...just not at the times or in the quantity they used to. Scoring a spot on Total Request Live is still a powerful marketing tool; the difference now is that the videos no longer have their huge appeal. Certainly, a good video won't sell bad music (although that was argued pretty strongly in the early 80s, as I mentioned), but a bad video could hurt a good song.</p><p></p><p>I don't mean to make the case that the music was ancillary to the popularity of the bands...but Greg Kihn, for example, didn't break out of his local music scene on to the national one solely based on his music. He, like plenty of other bands, reached the attention of a large audience because of his videos. Yes, they were a gimmick...but if he hadn't made a video when videos were still a fledgling tool, he wouldn't have rose to stardom (and later plummeted just as quickly) without it. Consider someone like Huey Lewis and the News or Chris De Burgh, consider the Fixx or Alphaville or aha. All of them have continued to put out music for the last 20 years - but they have been shunted to the back bins of the world, where many no longer even know they still put out albums.</p><p></p><p>In the 1982-1984 period, we had what was collectively called the Second British Invasion. So pervasive was it, that for the first time ever (and only time since then) there were more British acts on the charts than American ones in the US Charts. Why? MTV. All those bands had videos ready and willing to go, and MTV needed to fill the airwaves. It took several years for US acts to catch up. When they did, MTVs first true golden period was over....the field had been leveled. Videos were a powerful tool ONCE...now they are just a part of the landscape. I mean, Thriller was selling adequately for Michael Jackson when it first came out: Epic threatened to withhold all their artists if MTV didn't show the "Thriller" video, so they played it. The next week, the album (which had already been getting air-play nationwide) sold 800,000 albums. Groups like Hall and Oates, who had been getting national airplay for over a decade, suddenly found their careers skyrocketing with their MTV exposure. I think the truth may lie in the middle, though. Being a national shared experience is a part of it, and the videos themselves were a part of it. </p><p> </p><p>Showing Videos is still commercially viable. Fuse shows that, and MTV2 used to. But Viacom realizes that it can make more money with it's own cheap programming than with the 'radio station' concept it used to use. It's not that showing videos isn't economically viable...it's that selling 'Newlywed' t-shirts is more profitable.</p><p></p><p>And at the risk of sounding like an old fart, I think part of the reason is that the videos are mostly totally derivative, now. In the early 80s, you had stuff like Yes' "Owner of a Lonely Heart" and "Leave it", Thomas Dolby's "She Blinded me with Science", any video from Duran Duran's "Rio" album, Golden Earing's "Twilight Zone", Genesis "Illegal Alien", Mike and the Mechanics "All I need is a miracle", David Lee Roth's "California Girls", anything by Peter Gabriel and so on. Many of the videos since the 80s come across as 'contractual obligation video #3'....usually where the director has figured out some new visual gimmick to use while the band plays what is, essentially, an uninspired concert clip. Occasionally, this is interesting, like in the White Stripes' "Lego" video. All too often, it's just bad...as in the case of most rap videos, which are usually the singer walking through a crowded room with girls in bikins hanging off of him in full bling mode (Outkast excepted, of course).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WizarDru, post: 2498565, member: 151"] I see what you're saying, and I agree...to a point. I think you undervalue the power of the video, particularly when they were new. I remember middle-school and high-school, and how many videos in and off themselves were a topic of conversation...especially when they were linked together, often as a story of sorts. And let's not forget, MTv does still show videos...just not at the times or in the quantity they used to. Scoring a spot on Total Request Live is still a powerful marketing tool; the difference now is that the videos no longer have their huge appeal. Certainly, a good video won't sell bad music (although that was argued pretty strongly in the early 80s, as I mentioned), but a bad video could hurt a good song. I don't mean to make the case that the music was ancillary to the popularity of the bands...but Greg Kihn, for example, didn't break out of his local music scene on to the national one solely based on his music. He, like plenty of other bands, reached the attention of a large audience because of his videos. Yes, they were a gimmick...but if he hadn't made a video when videos were still a fledgling tool, he wouldn't have rose to stardom (and later plummeted just as quickly) without it. Consider someone like Huey Lewis and the News or Chris De Burgh, consider the Fixx or Alphaville or aha. All of them have continued to put out music for the last 20 years - but they have been shunted to the back bins of the world, where many no longer even know they still put out albums. In the 1982-1984 period, we had what was collectively called the Second British Invasion. So pervasive was it, that for the first time ever (and only time since then) there were more British acts on the charts than American ones in the US Charts. Why? MTV. All those bands had videos ready and willing to go, and MTV needed to fill the airwaves. It took several years for US acts to catch up. When they did, MTVs first true golden period was over....the field had been leveled. Videos were a powerful tool ONCE...now they are just a part of the landscape. I mean, Thriller was selling adequately for Michael Jackson when it first came out: Epic threatened to withhold all their artists if MTV didn't show the "Thriller" video, so they played it. The next week, the album (which had already been getting air-play nationwide) sold 800,000 albums. Groups like Hall and Oates, who had been getting national airplay for over a decade, suddenly found their careers skyrocketing with their MTV exposure. I think the truth may lie in the middle, though. Being a national shared experience is a part of it, and the videos themselves were a part of it. Showing Videos is still commercially viable. Fuse shows that, and MTV2 used to. But Viacom realizes that it can make more money with it's own cheap programming than with the 'radio station' concept it used to use. It's not that showing videos isn't economically viable...it's that selling 'Newlywed' t-shirts is more profitable. And at the risk of sounding like an old fart, I think part of the reason is that the videos are mostly totally derivative, now. In the early 80s, you had stuff like Yes' "Owner of a Lonely Heart" and "Leave it", Thomas Dolby's "She Blinded me with Science", any video from Duran Duran's "Rio" album, Golden Earing's "Twilight Zone", Genesis "Illegal Alien", Mike and the Mechanics "All I need is a miracle", David Lee Roth's "California Girls", anything by Peter Gabriel and so on. Many of the videos since the 80s come across as 'contractual obligation video #3'....usually where the director has figured out some new visual gimmick to use while the band plays what is, essentially, an uninspired concert clip. Occasionally, this is interesting, like in the White Stripes' "Lego" video. All too often, it's just bad...as in the case of most rap videos, which are usually the singer walking through a crowded room with girls in bikins hanging off of him in full bling mode (Outkast excepted, of course). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
MTV---Rembember when it was cool?
Top