Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Multi-attack actions = one attack or three?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="eamon" data-source="post: 5002779" data-attributes="member: 51942"><p>The errata to hospitaler's blessing makes it pretty clear that the blessing is intended to apply to attacks that are part of a multiattack action. They specifically fixed close and area attacks after all:<p style="margin-left: 20px">Page 101: Replace “attacks one of your allies” with</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">“makes an attack against one of your allies that does</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">not include you.” The former text generates a disproportionate</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">amount of healing, and it doesn’t give a</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">monster a good way to use close or area attacks without</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">healing its enemies.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p><p>In the last discussion on marking, including explicitly stuff like multiattacks when asked to CS they stated that the intent was to use a "singular" attack as in the combat section; i.e. a single attack is a single ranged, melee, area, or close attack. The combat section even explicitly states that if a ranged / melee attack has several targets that those are actually separate attacks.</p><p></p><p>Hospitaler's blessing applies to each attack by the marked enemy. On the other hand, according to the FAQ you're not forced to make all secondary attacks that a power grants (see chaos bolt), which would apply here too: the monster doesn't <em>need</em> to violate a mark if a multiattack includes the paladin; he can forgo attacks not including the paladin should it choose to do so.</p><p></p><p>Essentially, a multiattacking monster should not violate a hospitalers mark; certainly after the first attack when it discovers that it's strikes actually heal the target.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="eamon, post: 5002779, member: 51942"] The errata to hospitaler's blessing makes it pretty clear that the blessing is intended to apply to attacks that are part of a multiattack action. They specifically fixed close and area attacks after all:[INDENT]Page 101: Replace “attacks one of your allies” with “makes an attack against one of your allies that does not include you.” The former text generates a disproportionate amount of healing, and it doesn’t give a monster a good way to use close or area attacks without healing its enemies. [/INDENT]In the last discussion on marking, including explicitly stuff like multiattacks when asked to CS they stated that the intent was to use a "singular" attack as in the combat section; i.e. a single attack is a single ranged, melee, area, or close attack. The combat section even explicitly states that if a ranged / melee attack has several targets that those are actually separate attacks. Hospitaler's blessing applies to each attack by the marked enemy. On the other hand, according to the FAQ you're not forced to make all secondary attacks that a power grants (see chaos bolt), which would apply here too: the monster doesn't [I]need[/I] to violate a mark if a multiattack includes the paladin; he can forgo attacks not including the paladin should it choose to do so. Essentially, a multiattacking monster should not violate a hospitalers mark; certainly after the first attack when it discovers that it's strikes actually heal the target. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Multi-attack actions = one attack or three?
Top