Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 5002789" data-attributes="member: 12731">Again, perhaps I wasn't as clear as I could have been.Per the RAW, a Foulspawn Mangler or Skeletal Hammerer could trigger Hospitaler's no less than four times in a round. This is not something I'd consider to be in doubt.It is only if you believe the mark shouldn't be four times as effective against a Mangler than against, say, an Orc Berserker (who makes a single greataxe attack), you might want to consider alternatives.But these alternatives remain firmly outside the RAW. Hopefully this clears up (at least my post).A fighter using a Come and Get It can safely damage the pally's allies without triggering the mark. While the same fighter can't use Rain of Blows to damage the pally's allies without triggering the mark. As player abilities, it is reasonable to keep them apart.As monster abilities, some DMs might think it's too fiddly.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 5002789, member: 12731"] Again, perhaps I wasn't as clear as I could have been. Per the RAW, a Foulspawn Mangler or Skeletal Hammerer could trigger Hospitaler's no less than four times in a round. This is not something I'd consider to be in doubt. It is only if you believe the mark shouldn't be four times as effective against a Mangler than against, say, an Orc Berserker (who makes a single greataxe attack), you might want to consider alternatives. But these alternatives remain firmly outside the RAW. Hopefully this clears up (at least my post). A fighter using a Come and Get It can safely damage the pally's allies without triggering the mark. While the same fighter can't use Rain of Blows to damage the pally's allies without triggering the mark. As player abilities, it is reasonable to keep them apart. As monster abilities, some DMs might think it's too fiddly. [/QUOTE]

Verification