Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Aulirophile" data-source="post: 5243373" data-attributes="member: 86312">FighterWhenever an enemy marked by you is adjacent to you and&nbsp; shifts or makes an attack that does not include you, you can make a&nbsp; melee basic attack against that enemy.Paladin&nbsp;Also, it takes radiant damage equal to 3 + your Charisma modifier the&nbsp; first time it makes an attack that doesn’t include you as a target&nbsp; before the start of your next turnWardenAn enemy marked by you makes an attack that does not include you as a&nbsp; targetBattlemindAn adjacent enemy marked by you deals damage to your ally with an attack&nbsp; that doesn’t include you as a targetSwordmageIf that attack hits and the marked target is&nbsp; within 10 squares of you x3War PriestThe next time that enemy shifts or attacks a creature other than youSon of MercyThe target of your lawbreaker’s doom power is adjacent to you and makes&nbsp; an attack that does not include you.Even if one were to assume the target, and not the bolded attack part was the most relevant, both terms appear. It isn't &quot;Attack Power&quot; it is &quot;Attack.&quot; Melee attacks are separate attacks. The PHB is explicit about this, and you have no specific rule to over ride the fact that a multiple melee attacks are seperate attacks, and you have nothing to support the idea that &quot;attack power&quot; targeting the Marker is sufficient, since neither the MM nor &quot;how to a read power&quot; agree that targeting functions like that. In short: Attack Power =! Attack.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Aulirophile, post: 5243373, member: 86312"] Fighter [I]Whenever an enemy marked by you is adjacent to you and shifts or makes an [B]attack[/B] that does not include you, you can make a melee basic attack against that enemy.[/I] Paladin [I]Also, it takes radiant damage equal to 3 + your Charisma modifier the first time it makes an [B]attack[/B] that doesn’t include you as a target before the start of your next turn[/I] Warden [I]An enemy marked by you makes an [B]attack[/B] that does not include you as a target[/I] Battlemind [I]An adjacent enemy marked by you deals damage to your ally with an [B]attack[/B] that doesn’t include you as a target[/I] Swordmage [I]If that [B]attack [/B]hits and the marked target is within 10 squares of you[/I] x3 War Priest [I]The next time that enemy shifts or [B]attacks[/B] a creature other than you[/I] Son of Mercy [I]The target of your lawbreaker’s doom power is adjacent to you and makes an [B]attack[/B] that does not include you.[/I] Even if one were to assume the target, and not the bolded attack part was the most relevant, both terms appear. It isn't "Attack Power" it is "Attack." Melee attacks are [I]separate attacks. [/I]The PHB is explicit about this, and you have no specific rule to over ride the fact that a multiple melee attacks are seperate attacks, [I]and [/I]you have nothing to support the idea that "attack power" targeting the Marker is sufficient, since neither the MM nor "how to a read power" agree that targeting functions like that. In short: Attack Power =! Attack. [/QUOTE]

Verification