Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Andor" data-source="post: 4336123" data-attributes="member: 1879">Treat people? I said 4e left sense in the parking lot. Unless it says "4e" on his birth certificate that's not a personal attack.At any rate it's not the topic of this thread, but I see at least two other threads in the rules forums where there is considerable confusion on that topic so obviously there is nothing cut and dried about it.Back on topic...We've played 2 sessions of 4e so far. Based on the rituals preview where they said that illusions would be rituals I had thought of a Tiefling warrior of some sort who dabbled in illusions using rituals. Tiefling becuase I was curious to see if I could make the tail useful in combat. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />Now sadly the rituals included only a couple of very iffy illusions so that kinda fell by the wayside. So I made a Tiefling Rogue going for a swashbucklery feel with all the movement theoretically built in to 4e combat. Now that we have the Illusion magic web enhancment for wizards he'll be picking up the wizard multiclassing feat in the event we make it to 2nd level to pick his illusion dabbling back up.Incidently, there is nothing to let you use the tail in combat, although the picture of a tiefling in the bloody MM has a kife strapped to his tail, although it still apparently does nothing. Oh well, I can always make an unarmed attack and call it a tail slap.</blockquote>

Verification