Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Multi-grappling creatures
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ken-ichi" data-source="post: 1811489" data-attributes="member: 20061"><p>In short, yes.</p><p>A creature can take -20 on all of its grapple checks until its next turn in order to be considered not grappling. This allows it to attack other creatures while attempting to continue grappling the first. This is usually the best thing for large multi attack monsters to do when facing several opponents. Even if the creature fails to grapple, as long as its has the improved grab ability it is still dealing damage from its attack and can try again with its next attack. If the octopuss decides not to take the -20 and continues to grapple a single target, it has basically let go of the other targets.</p><p>If faced with a single enemy it may want to not take the -20 so that it has a much better chance of grappleing and then pinning its victim until it is dead.</p><p></p><p>A giant octopuss when facing 4 enemies take the -20 and attack each enemy twice. This allows the octopuss assuming it hits with each attack two chances of grappling the target. The target would take the tentacle damage from the two attacks and must succeed at two graaple checks or be grappled by the octopuss. </p><p>My question is if it wins both grapple checks against the same target, does the target take twice the constrict damage? (Constrict deals it damage with a successful grapple check) Or is constrict a yes or no condition? </p><p>Another question is can the octopuss make all 8 of its attacks before deciding who it wants to start a grapple with?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ken-ichi, post: 1811489, member: 20061"] In short, yes. A creature can take -20 on all of its grapple checks until its next turn in order to be considered not grappling. This allows it to attack other creatures while attempting to continue grappling the first. This is usually the best thing for large multi attack monsters to do when facing several opponents. Even if the creature fails to grapple, as long as its has the improved grab ability it is still dealing damage from its attack and can try again with its next attack. If the octopuss decides not to take the -20 and continues to grapple a single target, it has basically let go of the other targets. If faced with a single enemy it may want to not take the -20 so that it has a much better chance of grappleing and then pinning its victim until it is dead. A giant octopuss when facing 4 enemies take the -20 and attack each enemy twice. This allows the octopuss assuming it hits with each attack two chances of grappling the target. The target would take the tentacle damage from the two attacks and must succeed at two graaple checks or be grappled by the octopuss. My question is if it wins both grapple checks against the same target, does the target take twice the constrict damage? (Constrict deals it damage with a successful grapple check) Or is constrict a yes or no condition? Another question is can the octopuss make all 8 of its attacks before deciding who it wants to start a grapple with? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Multi-grappling creatures
Top