Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Obryn" data-source="post: 5992794" data-attributes="member: 11821">I can honestly say I don't much care for multiclassing at all, in any edition.In 1e/2e it was kind of wacky.  In 3e, it was a disguised point-buy.  In 4e, it was either multi-dabbling or "here's a set of rules for you to make a bad character."  Of these, I prefer the multi-dabbling, but that's because you're still sticking close to an archetype, overall.  I least prefer the 3e version because most every character picked something up (as long as they could keep their full casting progression).My ideal class-based system would more or less do away with multiclassing and do two things.  (1) Make classes broad and flexible enough to cover several closely-grouped archetypes, and (2) give enough archetypes you have a class that approaches your character concept.-O</blockquote>