Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="the Jester" data-source="post: 6472822" data-attributes="member: 1210">Because a wizard 11/cleric 1 has 6th level spells just like a wizard 12 does. Dude... people aren't quoting new evidence because they've already presented the evidence, and you're either misreading or ignoring it. You can play how you want, but I don't think there is any real doubt that everyone else has this right. It's spelled out, in so many words, in the PH multiclassing section. It's not vague (to me, anyhow). It's not opaque. It's not unclear. They have examples that help to illustrate it. You are, as far as I have seen, the only person who is taking your approach to it. There's no need to present new evidence. The multiclassing section is clear that it overrides the normal rules for a singleclassed spellcaster. It's perfectly clear on how it works. There's no wiggle room here by RAW, just as there's no wiggle room on the way "extra attack" works with multiclassed characters by RAW. If you want to play otherwise (and your DM is on board), by all means.</blockquote>