Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="marsupial_riot" data-source="post: 6472853" data-attributes="member: 6787760">might - past tense of may - expressing possibilityif you will note that ANY spellcaster, full progression or not, MAY choose to take spells of any level as they advance, even if they have a 9th level spell slot they MAY take magic missile.your example from the book is merely expressing that there is a possibility that you MAY gain some spell slots through the multiclass spellcaster table that are of a higher level than the spells that you currently know or prepare, and while this does not allow you to change your current spells known, it does allow you to cast the spells you already know at a higher level. that is the only thing expressed in that example. if you continue to reply or try to change my mind, i can keep posting the same stuff. really i hope you are not getting bent out of shape about it. as i noted earlier, i can understand your interpretation of it all, i really do. it is not terribly well expressed in the passage. and for what it is worth, i could totally be happy playing in a game like that if the dm choose to rule that way. so perhaps the real question i would ask you, and anyone who disagrees with my interpretation, is what do you see as the major flaw in terms of mechanics in my interpretation? is it merely are matter of your RAW interpretation or do you see a mechanical flaw or danger in reading as i have explained. im just curious. honestly its not a right or wrong thing for me. everyone plays the game differently, at this point im just trying to understand your great concern.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="marsupial_riot, post: 6472853, member: 6787760"] might - past tense of may - expressing possibility if you will note that ANY spellcaster, full progression or not, MAY choose to take spells of any level as they advance, even if they have a 9th level spell slot they MAY take magic missile. your example from the book is merely expressing that there is a possibility that you MAY gain some spell slots through the multiclass spellcaster table that are of a higher level than the spells that you currently know or prepare, and while this does not allow you to change your current spells known, it does allow you to cast the spells you already know at a higher level. that is the only thing expressed in that example. if you continue to reply or try to change my mind, i can keep posting the same stuff. really i hope you are not getting bent out of shape about it. as i noted earlier, i can understand your interpretation of it all, i really do. it is not terribly well expressed in the passage. and for what it is worth, i could totally be happy playing in a game like that if the dm choose to rule that way. so perhaps the real question i would ask you, and anyone who disagrees with my interpretation, is what do you see as the major flaw in terms of mechanics in my interpretation? is it merely are matter of your RAW interpretation or do you see a mechanical flaw or danger in reading as i have explained. im just curious. honestly its not a right or wrong thing for me. everyone plays the game differently, at this point im just trying to understand your great concern. [/QUOTE]

Verification