Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Multiclassing and Epic Progression
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jackinthegreen" data-source="post: 6085716" data-attributes="member: 6678119"><p>1: Yes. A character with 20 wizard levels is still a character with 20 wizard levels, regardless of when it takes them, with regards to spellcasting and most everything but BAB and saves.</p><p></p><p>2: Yes. The character would, strictly speaking, have a BAB of 10 since the rules say "...the character’s base attack bonus does not increase after character level reaches 20th." Likewise, the paragraph <a href="http://www.d20srd.org/srd/epic/basics.htm#addingaSecondClass" target="_blank">here</a> says that adding a separate class would not grant its BAB or save progression since those are subsumed by an Epic character progression. However, this is inconsistent with monsters such as, say, the <a href="http://www.d20srd.org/srd/epic/monsters/hoaryHunter.htm" target="_blank">Hoary Hunter</a> which is a fey, and as a fey it would normally get 1/2 its HD as BAB. Since it clearly has 4 attacks on a full attack, it also clearly has at least BAB +16. In fact, the entry for Base Attack says it's +23 which lines up with its 46 fey HD.</p><p></p><p>If one looks at a monster with racial HD and class levels, one can find the <a href="http://www.d20srd.org/srd/monsters/giant.htm#frostGiant" target="_blank">Frost Giant Jarl</a> which has 14 giant levels and 8 blackguard levels, for total HD of 22. Despite hitting 20 HD though, its Blackguard levels still granted it 2 BAB. Supposedly 3.X was meant to keep things internally consistent and have pretty much the same rules for monsters as for player characters, but that obviously breaks down here.</p><p></p><p>In short, the Epic rules aren't consistent with actual printed material and this could lead to a DM deciding it's BS for a character to not at least get its best BAB up to +20. I am one of those who, if I were to DM, would call BS on it and let the character get its full BAB up to +20.</p><p></p><p>a: Assuming one still sticks to the rule that a character does not get BAB beyond level 20 even if it has classes that would get it to that point, then it's possible that the character would be better off taking the first 20 levels as fighter for the extra BAB and attacks.</p><p></p><p>b: Besides caster level, the wizard would lose a better familiar (as per <a href="http://www.d20srd.org/srd/epic/classProgressions.htm#epicWizard" target="_blank">Epic Wizard</a>) as well as the extra feats granted by being an epic wizard.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jackinthegreen, post: 6085716, member: 6678119"] 1: Yes. A character with 20 wizard levels is still a character with 20 wizard levels, regardless of when it takes them, with regards to spellcasting and most everything but BAB and saves. 2: Yes. The character would, strictly speaking, have a BAB of 10 since the rules say "...the character’s base attack bonus does not increase after character level reaches 20th." Likewise, the paragraph [URL="http://www.d20srd.org/srd/epic/basics.htm#addingaSecondClass"]here[/URL] says that adding a separate class would not grant its BAB or save progression since those are subsumed by an Epic character progression. However, this is inconsistent with monsters such as, say, the [URL="http://www.d20srd.org/srd/epic/monsters/hoaryHunter.htm"]Hoary Hunter[/URL] which is a fey, and as a fey it would normally get 1/2 its HD as BAB. Since it clearly has 4 attacks on a full attack, it also clearly has at least BAB +16. In fact, the entry for Base Attack says it's +23 which lines up with its 46 fey HD. If one looks at a monster with racial HD and class levels, one can find the [URL="http://www.d20srd.org/srd/monsters/giant.htm#frostGiant"]Frost Giant Jarl[/URL] which has 14 giant levels and 8 blackguard levels, for total HD of 22. Despite hitting 20 HD though, its Blackguard levels still granted it 2 BAB. Supposedly 3.X was meant to keep things internally consistent and have pretty much the same rules for monsters as for player characters, but that obviously breaks down here. In short, the Epic rules aren't consistent with actual printed material and this could lead to a DM deciding it's BS for a character to not at least get its best BAB up to +20. I am one of those who, if I were to DM, would call BS on it and let the character get its full BAB up to +20. a: Assuming one still sticks to the rule that a character does not get BAB beyond level 20 even if it has classes that would get it to that point, then it's possible that the character would be better off taking the first 20 levels as fighter for the extra BAB and attacks. b: Besides caster level, the wizard would lose a better familiar (as per [URL="http://www.d20srd.org/srd/epic/classProgressions.htm#epicWizard"]Epic Wizard[/URL]) as well as the extra feats granted by being an epic wizard. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Multiclassing and Epic Progression
Top