Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sadras" data-source="post: 6268715" data-attributes="member: 6688277">For our example lets take the Wizard/FighterIn our group we have a wizard(6)/fighter(1), who has not min-maxed his score, so he placed a 14 str but with that first level of fighter he gained proficiency in armour and most weapons. So he is able to wear scale mail, benefits from his dex by 2 and can carry a shield, selected the Defense Fighting Style and casts spells with his other hand. Pretty good armour class rating for a wizard - 19 AC But in all fairness he did give himself 14 strength so conceptually his character can move comfortably in the armour. Is this ok? Would you do it different? Should we have a required strength for using certain heavier armours in combat? Should 1st level in fighter give a multi-class character proficiency in so many weapons and armour right from the get go? Basically what are you thoughts on this or what houserules would you implement if you were dissatisfied with the current rules?</blockquote>