Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Lanefan" data-source="post: 9461106" data-attributes="member: 29398">Either of those.&nbsp; A Ftr-1/Rog-1 is IMO multiclass in both classes and (ideally) should in abilities add to considerably less than the combination of a single-class Ftr-1 and a single-class Rog-1.&nbsp; My specific intent here is that to get the best benefits of playing both classes you have to play two characters: one a single-class Fighter, the other a single-class Rogue.A character that can do a bit of everything doesn't nearly as much need a party around it, which kinda blows up the whole idea of interdependent parties potentially being greater than the sum of their parts due to that interdependence and teamwork.You also end up with situations where the Ftr-Rog player above might say &quot;I'm the party Warrior.&nbsp; I'm also the party Scout.&quot; meaning anyone else wanting to play either of those class groups has to either find something else or compete for the same in-game resources and at-table spotlight.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Lanefan, post: 9461106, member: 29398"] Either of those. A Ftr-1/Rog-1 is IMO multiclass in both classes and (ideally) should in abilities add to considerably less than the combination of a single-class Ftr-1 and a single-class Rog-1. My specific intent here is that to get the best benefits of playing both classes you have to play two characters: one a single-class Fighter, the other a single-class Rogue. A character that can do a bit of everything doesn't nearly as much need a party around it, which kinda blows up the whole idea of interdependent parties potentially being greater than the sum of their parts due to that interdependence and teamwork. You also end up with situations where the Ftr-Rog player above might say "I'm the party Warrior. I'm also the party Scout." meaning anyone else wanting to play either of those class groups has to either find something else or compete for the same in-game resources and at-table spotlight. [/QUOTE]

Verification