Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="MoonSong" data-source="post: 6606759" data-attributes="member: 6689464">Well, <ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">A sorcerer gets pretty much the same from a bard dip, and that isn't disallowed by the stat requirements. </li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">The fighter can pick bless with a feat, and wisdom is such a common save that having a 13 isn't that rare for a fighter.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">A paladin wanting shield can also dip sorcerer and he qualifies by default.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Wizards needing dex for AC already makes them fairly easy to pick those two levels of fighter. </li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">As for con saves, sorcerers are already proficient with em, bards and warlocks can dip naturally from them, Dex is so common wizards can easily afford it, the same as clerics and druids that usually can afford str. And it doesn't save a feat, dipping delays feats.</li>
</ul>Requirements don't remove dips, all they do is force everything to synergize and leave on only the most stereotypical and boring concepts.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="MoonSong, post: 6606759, member: 6689464"] Well, [LIST] [*]A sorcerer gets pretty much the same from a bard dip, and that isn't disallowed by the stat requirements. [*]The fighter can pick bless with a feat, and wisdom is such a common save that having a 13 isn't that rare for a fighter. [*]A paladin wanting shield can also dip sorcerer and he qualifies by default. [*]Wizards needing dex for AC already makes them fairly easy to pick those two levels of fighter. [*]As for con saves, sorcerers are already proficient with em, bards and warlocks can dip naturally from them, Dex is so common wizards can easily afford it, the same as clerics and druids that usually can afford str. And it doesn't save a feat, dipping delays feats. [/LIST] Requirements don't remove dips, all they do is force everything to synergize and leave on only the most stereotypical and boring concepts. [/QUOTE]

Verification