Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Multige classes and Gestalt levels
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cheiromancer" data-source="post: 2233025" data-attributes="member: 141"><p>I've been thinking about this some more, and while I think that the gestalt-2 variant (no feats traded in) is about equal to the masterclass system (no feats traded in), I think there is a discrepancy when feats are traded in. Consider the following packages:</p><p></p><p>Package A</p><p>fighter level + wizard level + 2 feats </p><p></p><p>Package B</p><p>master fighter level + master wizard level</p><p></p><p>Package C</p><p>2 gestalt fighter-wizard levels</p><p></p><p>In the master class build you can trade in package A and get package B (when you want 12 master classes instead of only 10). In the gestalt-2 model you trade in package A and get package C (when you want gestalt levels at odd levels). Both packages give you a bonus fighter feat and +2 CL in wizard. Package B gives you +1.5 BAB and (d10+d4) = 8 hp, while package C gives you +2.0 BAB and (d10+d10) = 11 hp. So Package C is worth a fair bit more than Package B.</p><p></p><p>Now, I have a sneaky suspicion that Package B is probably worth a little more than Package A. But Package C is clearly too good. Which means that it is broken to trade Package A for Package B. So if you use the gestalt-2 system, you shouldn't allow extra gestalt levels to be taken if the cost per gestalt level is only 1 feat.</p><p></p><p>I also think that the master class system, while better than the vanilla MT and EK builds, is not *too* much better. The gestalt-4 system starts off allowing 11 gestalt levels. So already it is a lot better than the gestalt-2 system which starts off with only 8. It is as if you gave a gestalt-2 build 3 free feats which were then traded in to convert ordinary levels to gestalt levels. Too good.</p><p></p><p>So, I would say the only non-broken gestalt level variant is the following:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Unfortunately, that won't give you a BAB 16 build with CL 17; the target for a gish build. The best it can do is fighter 3/wizard 9/fighter-wizard 8, with a BAB of 15. It won't even give you a cleric 13/wizard 17 build, which even a mystic theurge can do (best is an 11/17 split) It's just a fact that gestalt builds tend to have better hp, skills and BAB, and so they can't afford to have as good a caster level.</p><p></p><p>(Actually, if you use a house-ruled Warrior that has a +0.25 BAB every level as a special ability, then you can make a decent gish. Or a feat that can be taken once to give a +1 BAB. Or something. But a wizard/cleric 17/13 would still be out, let alone a 17/17.)</p><p></p><p>For simplicity, the gestalt-2 mechanic listed above works great. I like it, but I don't know how it can be fixed up to fully solve the multige problem.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cheiromancer, post: 2233025, member: 141"] I've been thinking about this some more, and while I think that the gestalt-2 variant (no feats traded in) is about equal to the masterclass system (no feats traded in), I think there is a discrepancy when feats are traded in. Consider the following packages: Package A fighter level + wizard level + 2 feats Package B master fighter level + master wizard level Package C 2 gestalt fighter-wizard levels In the master class build you can trade in package A and get package B (when you want 12 master classes instead of only 10). In the gestalt-2 model you trade in package A and get package C (when you want gestalt levels at odd levels). Both packages give you a bonus fighter feat and +2 CL in wizard. Package B gives you +1.5 BAB and (d10+d4) = 8 hp, while package C gives you +2.0 BAB and (d10+d10) = 11 hp. So Package C is worth a fair bit more than Package B. Now, I have a sneaky suspicion that Package B is probably worth a little more than Package A. But Package C is clearly too good. Which means that it is broken to trade Package A for Package B. So if you use the gestalt-2 system, you shouldn't allow extra gestalt levels to be taken if the cost per gestalt level is only 1 feat. I also think that the master class system, while better than the vanilla MT and EK builds, is not *too* much better. The gestalt-4 system starts off allowing 11 gestalt levels. So already it is a lot better than the gestalt-2 system which starts off with only 8. It is as if you gave a gestalt-2 build 3 free feats which were then traded in to convert ordinary levels to gestalt levels. Too good. So, I would say the only non-broken gestalt level variant is the following: Unfortunately, that won't give you a BAB 16 build with CL 17; the target for a gish build. The best it can do is fighter 3/wizard 9/fighter-wizard 8, with a BAB of 15. It won't even give you a cleric 13/wizard 17 build, which even a mystic theurge can do (best is an 11/17 split) It's just a fact that gestalt builds tend to have better hp, skills and BAB, and so they can't afford to have as good a caster level. (Actually, if you use a house-ruled Warrior that has a +0.25 BAB every level as a special ability, then you can make a decent gish. Or a feat that can be taken once to give a +1 BAB. Or something. But a wizard/cleric 17/13 would still be out, let alone a 17/17.) For simplicity, the gestalt-2 mechanic listed above works great. I like it, but I don't know how it can be fixed up to fully solve the multige problem. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Multige classes and Gestalt levels
Top