Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Multipathing - or Intraclass Multiclassing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Salthorae" data-source="post: 6598608" data-attributes="member: 1095"><p><em>All statements contained in this post are personal opinions and in no way reflect absolute statements of 5th edition.</em></p><p></p><p>I looked for a similar thread via search, but could not find anything. </p><p></p><p><strong>Problem:</strong> The rigidity of the intra-class path choices in D&D 5th edition. </p><p></p><p>By this I mean for example... If I am playing a rogue, and through the game by level 3 I have trained as a thief. Then despite my best role play and DM efforts, even if I later take money to kill people and am welcomed whole heartedly into the Assassin's guild by the Grandfather of Assassins, never can my character actually learn the skills of an assassin or assassination. </p><p></p><p>The same holds true for all the classes. </p><p></p><p>To me this is a huge problem that limits class abilities to map or work with role play possibilities. </p><p></p><p><strong>Solution:</strong> Multipathing</p><p></p><p>By this I mean the ability to intra-class multiclass. You could mix this with regular 5e multiclassing without any issues or balance problems I think as well. </p><p></p><p><strong>Rationale:</strong> This concept allows a player to remain within the larger class concept they have chosen, but to free themselves up a bit to mix and match to fit where the game may take them a bit more than being forced outside of their class to do something different than the initially chosen path.</p><p></p><p><strong>Framework:</strong> Simply put, what i propose is based on the simple idea that each classes path abilitiy gains are all internally consistent to those classes. E.g., all the rogue paths gain abilities at set levels of 3,9,13, & 17. Though all the classes differ from each other in this, internally they are consistent. </p><p></p><p><strong>Proposal:</strong> At each new path/archetype ability gain level, allow the player to select a new path from those available to that class, but from the lowest level not already possessed in the new path. </p><p></p><p>For example, my Rogue who initially started out as her career path as a thief and at level 3 learned the abilities of <em>Fast Hands</em> and <em>Second-Story Work</em> has just gained level 9 as a rogue. Normally this would mean that she would gain the <em>Supreme Sneak</em> ability. However in the intervening 6 levels of role play, she freelanced as a killer for hire, caught the eye of the assassin's guild and was courted and taken in by them. So now at level 9, she chooses to gain the 3rd level Assassin archetype abilities of <em>Bonus Proficiencies</em> and <em>Assassinate</em> rather than continue to advance her Thief abilities. </p><p></p><p>Similarly, at 13th level, she could choose to select either of the next level abilities of the two paths already trod, either <em>Supreme Sneak</em> or <em>Infiltration Expertise</em>. OR she could learn the Arcane Trickser's <em>Spellcasting</em> and <em>Mage Hand Legerdemain</em>. Then at 17th level, she could choose a 9th level ability from one of the three paths, or having stayed with only 2 paths could either select a 13th level ability from the path advanced to 9th or a second 9th level ability. </p><p></p><p><strong>Issues:</strong> Thus far the only issues I have seen with this concept relate to the Monastic Tradition of the Way of the Four Elements and that they select an elemental discipline based on their overall monk level. This would have to be further clarified to Path level rather than Monk level. </p><p></p><p><strong>Summary:</strong> Overall I think this is a simple, elegant method of freeing up the rigidity of the 5th edition class/path system a bit while still maintaining the overall balance of the classes as a whole. Just like regular multiclassing, you gain breadth, only within a class not between classses, at the expense of the Single Path characters higher level powers/abilities. </p><p></p><p>I welcome feedback and thoughts from the community at large. Let me know what you think and if this is workable or not. if you see glaring points of brokenness that I am just not seeing, please shine a light on them so I can either scrap this system or patch the hole.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Salthorae, post: 6598608, member: 1095"] [I]All statements contained in this post are personal opinions and in no way reflect absolute statements of 5th edition.[/I] I looked for a similar thread via search, but could not find anything. [B]Problem:[/B] The rigidity of the intra-class path choices in D&D 5th edition. By this I mean for example... If I am playing a rogue, and through the game by level 3 I have trained as a thief. Then despite my best role play and DM efforts, even if I later take money to kill people and am welcomed whole heartedly into the Assassin's guild by the Grandfather of Assassins, never can my character actually learn the skills of an assassin or assassination. The same holds true for all the classes. To me this is a huge problem that limits class abilities to map or work with role play possibilities. [B]Solution:[/B] Multipathing By this I mean the ability to intra-class multiclass. You could mix this with regular 5e multiclassing without any issues or balance problems I think as well. [B]Rationale:[/B] This concept allows a player to remain within the larger class concept they have chosen, but to free themselves up a bit to mix and match to fit where the game may take them a bit more than being forced outside of their class to do something different than the initially chosen path. [B]Framework:[/B] Simply put, what i propose is based on the simple idea that each classes path abilitiy gains are all internally consistent to those classes. E.g., all the rogue paths gain abilities at set levels of 3,9,13, & 17. Though all the classes differ from each other in this, internally they are consistent. [B]Proposal:[/B] At each new path/archetype ability gain level, allow the player to select a new path from those available to that class, but from the lowest level not already possessed in the new path. For example, my Rogue who initially started out as her career path as a thief and at level 3 learned the abilities of [I]Fast Hands[/I] and [I]Second-Story Work[/I] has just gained level 9 as a rogue. Normally this would mean that she would gain the [I]Supreme Sneak[/I] ability. However in the intervening 6 levels of role play, she freelanced as a killer for hire, caught the eye of the assassin's guild and was courted and taken in by them. So now at level 9, she chooses to gain the 3rd level Assassin archetype abilities of [I]Bonus Proficiencies[/I] and [I]Assassinate[/I] rather than continue to advance her Thief abilities. Similarly, at 13th level, she could choose to select either of the next level abilities of the two paths already trod, either [I]Supreme Sneak[/I] or [I]Infiltration Expertise[/I]. OR she could learn the Arcane Trickser's [I]Spellcasting[/I] and [I]Mage Hand Legerdemain[/I]. Then at 17th level, she could choose a 9th level ability from one of the three paths, or having stayed with only 2 paths could either select a 13th level ability from the path advanced to 9th or a second 9th level ability. [B]Issues:[/B] Thus far the only issues I have seen with this concept relate to the Monastic Tradition of the Way of the Four Elements and that they select an elemental discipline based on their overall monk level. This would have to be further clarified to Path level rather than Monk level. [B]Summary:[/B] Overall I think this is a simple, elegant method of freeing up the rigidity of the 5th edition class/path system a bit while still maintaining the overall balance of the classes as a whole. Just like regular multiclassing, you gain breadth, only within a class not between classses, at the expense of the Single Path characters higher level powers/abilities. I welcome feedback and thoughts from the community at large. Let me know what you think and if this is workable or not. if you see glaring points of brokenness that I am just not seeing, please shine a light on them so I can either scrap this system or patch the hole. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Multipathing - or Intraclass Multiclassing
Top