Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Multiple Concentration
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 7543269" data-attributes="member: 12731"><p>Which many of us considers a flaw in the sorcerer design. </p><p></p><p>Effectively this argument is saying that the only thing that keeps the sorcerer cool is denying stuff to other classes. </p><p></p><p>I would much prefer if every class is cool on its own, and didn't get its unique schtick from putting its boot on the throat of others.</p><p></p><p>High-level Wizards should definitely be able to bend or break some or all of 5E's limitations on magic. The sorcerer will have to get another claim to fame, because "I'm the only one who gets to break the harsh limits on magic" is unacceptable in D&D.</p><p></p><p>As proof I give you the coolest high-level NPCs that already do that. They have legendary actions and saves. They even have special exceptions (such as more spell slots). </p><p></p><p>While the RAW is fine for most of the game, it becomes boringly constricting once play enters Tier IV. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Zapp</p><p></p><p>PS. If that makes you counter with the argument "but if Wizards get cool stuff at levels 17+, so should Fighters and other classes too!"...</p><p></p><p>... then you would get no objection from me! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> I absolutely agree, as long as you don't pull off the inverted argument "since Fighters don't get cool stuff, Wizards should not get cool stuff either!"</p><p></p><p>This is balderdash - of course Archmages should have much more tricks up their sleeves than the outright anemic NPC stat block suggests!</p><p></p><p>(The Archmage NPC stat block is fine for the purpose of offering up a quick and simple stat block during single-digit level play, where an Archmage outlevels the party by a significant margin, and where having to fight one would likely indicate the party did something wrong at an earlier turn. </p><p></p><p>Once a Wizard with level 9 spells becomes an "level-appropriate threat", you need more from a stat block if that creature is to look and feel archmagey even a little. Unless you're cool with having "archmages" as dime a dozen henchmen opponents, who cast one spell and then die)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 7543269, member: 12731"] Which many of us considers a flaw in the sorcerer design. Effectively this argument is saying that the only thing that keeps the sorcerer cool is denying stuff to other classes. I would much prefer if every class is cool on its own, and didn't get its unique schtick from putting its boot on the throat of others. High-level Wizards should definitely be able to bend or break some or all of 5E's limitations on magic. The sorcerer will have to get another claim to fame, because "I'm the only one who gets to break the harsh limits on magic" is unacceptable in D&D. As proof I give you the coolest high-level NPCs that already do that. They have legendary actions and saves. They even have special exceptions (such as more spell slots). While the RAW is fine for most of the game, it becomes boringly constricting once play enters Tier IV. Zapp PS. If that makes you counter with the argument "but if Wizards get cool stuff at levels 17+, so should Fighters and other classes too!"... ... then you would get no objection from me! :) I absolutely agree, as long as you don't pull off the inverted argument "since Fighters don't get cool stuff, Wizards should not get cool stuff either!" This is balderdash - of course Archmages should have much more tricks up their sleeves than the outright anemic NPC stat block suggests! (The Archmage NPC stat block is fine for the purpose of offering up a quick and simple stat block during single-digit level play, where an Archmage outlevels the party by a significant margin, and where having to fight one would likely indicate the party did something wrong at an earlier turn. Once a Wizard with level 9 spells becomes an "level-appropriate threat", you need more from a stat block if that creature is to look and feel archmagey even a little. Unless you're cool with having "archmages" as dime a dozen henchmen opponents, who cast one spell and then die) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Multiple Concentration
Top