Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Multiple condition tracks?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sammael" data-source="post: 3739998" data-attributes="member: 4475"><p>First of all, a disclaimer: I (1) like having a built-in "death spiral" type of thing in D&D and (2) prefer SAGA's condition track to the bazillion conditions in 3.x.</p><p></p><p>However, what's bothering me is that the condition track only covers physical penalties.</p><p></p><p>What about a condition track for the character's mental state - charmed, dominated, etc? I've seen several suggestions for "mental hit points" over the past few days, and I think this "Resolve Track" would be an easier solution. It would also make sense (IMO) with any future psionic rules, especially psionic combat. </p><p></p><p>Basically, you could have mind-affecting attacks which target specific points along the track, but also mind-affecting attacks which simply push the character further along the track. Furthermore, this could reduce the "all or nothing" nature of enchantments; for example, a failed <em>dominate</em> effect could still push the target one step on the track, perhaps so that he is in a <em>charmed</em> state. Not enough to break the target's will completely, but enough to weaken their resolve. I think there are plenty of precedents for this in D&D history - what with mind flayers and such often having to "break in" their thralls, before they become fully complacent.</p><p></p><p>So... what's your opinion? Is this too complicated? IMO, a good designer could make this idea work better than the various 3.x mental conditions.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sammael, post: 3739998, member: 4475"] First of all, a disclaimer: I (1) like having a built-in "death spiral" type of thing in D&D and (2) prefer SAGA's condition track to the bazillion conditions in 3.x. However, what's bothering me is that the condition track only covers physical penalties. What about a condition track for the character's mental state - charmed, dominated, etc? I've seen several suggestions for "mental hit points" over the past few days, and I think this "Resolve Track" would be an easier solution. It would also make sense (IMO) with any future psionic rules, especially psionic combat. Basically, you could have mind-affecting attacks which target specific points along the track, but also mind-affecting attacks which simply push the character further along the track. Furthermore, this could reduce the "all or nothing" nature of enchantments; for example, a failed [i]dominate[/i] effect could still push the target one step on the track, perhaps so that he is in a [i]charmed[/i] state. Not enough to break the target's will completely, but enough to weaken their resolve. I think there are plenty of precedents for this in D&D history - what with mind flayers and such often having to "break in" their thralls, before they become fully complacent. So... what's your opinion? Is this too complicated? IMO, a good designer could make this idea work better than the various 3.x mental conditions. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Multiple condition tracks?
Top