Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jondor_Battlehammer" data-source="post: 297900" data-attributes="member: 5335">Just for fun I think I'll toss out an idea I've had. What about a double Flame weapon? (Ironic that this may result in a flame.<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> )A +2 total cost, +2D6 fire damage. You get the benefits of multiple elemental enhancements without the oddity of diferrent elemental types. It focuses on the intent the blade was made for as opposed to just tacking on a cheap modifier. You would even have an easier time letting all the damage activate in one round, it is after all the same type. I certainly don't think it's over powered.Actually, looking at it now, I cannot find the reference I thought kept you from doing this. Oh well, I'll toss it out anyway. I haven't heard of it being done before.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jondor_Battlehammer, post: 297900, member: 5335"] Just for fun I think I'll toss out an idea I've had. What about a double Flame weapon? (Ironic that this may result in a flame.:) ) A +2 total cost, +2D6 fire damage. You get the benefits of multiple elemental enhancements without the oddity of diferrent elemental types. It focuses on the intent the blade was made for as opposed to just tacking on a cheap modifier. You would even have an easier time letting all the damage activate in one round, it is after all the same type. I certainly don't think it's over powered. Actually, looking at it now, I cannot find the reference I thought kept you from doing this. Oh well, I'll toss it out anyway. I haven't heard of it being done before. [/QUOTE]

Verification