Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Infiniti2000" data-source="post: 4987280" data-attributes="member: 31734">I'd actually have a problem with &quot;vulnerable 5 all&quot; in the first place.&nbsp; That makes no sense and would challenge the design of anything that had that or gave it at as condition to someone.&nbsp; Does anything do this?&nbsp; If so, let me know so I can keep an eye out and avoid that crap.Regardless, I don't see anything wrong with stacking vulnerabilities like that.&nbsp; If someone has a problem with it, I'd suggest looking more closely at why those multiple vulnerabilities exist and that maybe your problem should be there.&nbsp; Come up with actual examples and see if it works as you'd like.&nbsp; I'd wager that trying to negate the stacking vulnerabilities will actually be nerfing some powers.&nbsp; For example, a monster has vulnerable 5 cold.&nbsp; You know this somehow (knowledge check, experience, whatever).&nbsp; You then use a power (or an ally does) to grant him also vulnerable 5 thunder until the end of your next turn and then hit him with another power that deals cold and thunder damage.&nbsp; How is this broken?&nbsp; Why shouldn't the player be rewarded for this?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Infiniti2000, post: 4987280, member: 31734"] I'd actually have a problem with "vulnerable 5 all" in the first place. That makes no sense and would challenge the design of anything that had that or gave it at as condition to someone. Does anything do this? If so, let me know so I can keep an eye out and avoid that crap. Regardless, I don't see anything wrong with stacking vulnerabilities like that. If someone has a problem with it, I'd suggest looking more closely at why those multiple vulnerabilities exist and that maybe your problem should be there. Come up with actual examples and see if it works as you'd like. I'd wager that trying to negate the stacking vulnerabilities will actually be nerfing some powers. For example, a monster has vulnerable 5 cold. You know this somehow (knowledge check, experience, whatever). You then use a power (or an ally does) to grant him also vulnerable 5 thunder until the end of your next turn and then hit him with another power that deals cold and thunder damage. How is this broken? Why shouldn't the player be rewarded for this? [/QUOTE]

Verification