Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 4498176" data-attributes="member: 22779">Are you honestly going to claim that a no caster, no non-human party was anything other than an extreme rarity in any edition of D&amp;D?While, it may be true that &quot;my playstyle&quot; wasn't universal, I'm thinking that it was a heck of a lot more common than what you're referring to.How's this for a test?&nbsp; Show me a D&amp;D setting, whether TSR/WotC or 3rd party that's low magic/mundane and I'll match it with two settings that are not.&nbsp; We'll see who runs out of settings first.Just a quibble, but it's two levels.&nbsp; By third, you're able to take several times the punishment that a town guard could take.&nbsp; That's stretching the point don't you think?&nbsp; Two whole levels out of 20 where you have a mundane campaign?&nbsp; And, even then, it's not really mundane at the vast majority of tables.&nbsp; Then again, I suppose if we define warlocks and elves as mundane, then I suppose it could be pushed further.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 4498176, member: 22779"] Are you honestly going to claim that a no caster, no non-human party was anything other than an extreme rarity in any edition of D&D? While, it may be true that "my playstyle" wasn't universal, I'm thinking that it was a heck of a lot more common than what you're referring to. How's this for a test? Show me a D&D setting, whether TSR/WotC or 3rd party that's low magic/mundane and I'll match it with two settings that are not. We'll see who runs out of settings first. Just a quibble, but it's two levels. By third, you're able to take several times the punishment that a town guard could take. That's stretching the point don't you think? Two whole levels out of 20 where you have a mundane campaign? And, even then, it's not really mundane at the vast majority of tables. Then again, I suppose if we define warlocks and elves as mundane, then I suppose it could be pushed further. [/QUOTE]

Verification