Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Muscular Neutrality (thought experiment)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 9530567" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>I was thinking, for example, sexual assault. There is no context I can conceive of where a CG person would do that. I don't personally see CG as consequentialist.</p><p></p><p>I also find that consequentialism has a very serious risk of actively encouraging evil behavior in the name of good, if it is calibrated at the wrong scale. Things of the "well if we purify the gene pool <em>now,</em> we make everyone better forever after!!" that are, as stated, literally just evil in a funny hat.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Really? I find it trivially easy to keep the two separate, and I say that as someone who has been described by friends as actually Lawful Good in real life.</p><p></p><p>Law is a <em>tool</em>. Good is a <em>goal</em>. Laws are by definition teleological, they pursue some chosen end, but Law itself cannot tell you <em>which</em> ends are worthy. Good (or Evil!) can tell you which ends are worthy, but need not specify any particular method for seeking those ends.</p><p></p><p></p><p>"Sacrifice" only when it is needful or highly beneficial, to be clear. Sacrifice simply to <em>be</em> sacrificial is generally frowned upon. ("Or if I give my body to the flames that I may boast, but I have not love, I gain nothing.")</p><p></p><p>I also don't think electing to make sacrifices for another, nor choosing to do something kind purely because kindness is the right thing to do, need to have any relationship whatsoever to individual relationships. Firefighters save people from burning buildings without knowing anything about them. Some people donate huge sums of money to charity and yet wish their donations to remain anonymous; that is altruism specifically <em>without</em> individual relationships, since the donation is made in secret. I myself have tried to give aid and charity to people I have never met and will never know, because I believe it is the right thing to do, even if nobody ever knows about it. "Character is who you are in the dark."</p><p></p><p>Good is about doing right by others, even if it isn't easy or comfortable to do so. Part of doing right by others is trying to understand what they want and need, and respecting them as ends in themselves, never to be seen as means to some other end. Another part is sharing what you have with those in need, even if that means you get less as a result. A further part is making sacrifices for others that are in need. Etc. These things require thought and consideration to implement wisely. They cannot be boiled down to a pithy maxim or list of singular instructions.</p><p></p><p>(And, to be clear? I LOVE it when works actually put in the time to give Evil the same treatment. It's boring to make Evil boil down to "graaah, feel my unholy rage!!!!" or "what if Nazis....were ALIENS???" It's <em>so</em> much more interesting when Evil has <em>reasons,</em> and is trying to <em>win the argument,</em> not just kill their debate opponent.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 9530567, member: 6790260"] I was thinking, for example, sexual assault. There is no context I can conceive of where a CG person would do that. I don't personally see CG as consequentialist. I also find that consequentialism has a very serious risk of actively encouraging evil behavior in the name of good, if it is calibrated at the wrong scale. Things of the "well if we purify the gene pool [I]now,[/I] we make everyone better forever after!!" that are, as stated, literally just evil in a funny hat. Really? I find it trivially easy to keep the two separate, and I say that as someone who has been described by friends as actually Lawful Good in real life. Law is a [I]tool[/I]. Good is a [I]goal[/I]. Laws are by definition teleological, they pursue some chosen end, but Law itself cannot tell you [I]which[/I] ends are worthy. Good (or Evil!) can tell you which ends are worthy, but need not specify any particular method for seeking those ends. "Sacrifice" only when it is needful or highly beneficial, to be clear. Sacrifice simply to [I]be[/I] sacrificial is generally frowned upon. ("Or if I give my body to the flames that I may boast, but I have not love, I gain nothing.") I also don't think electing to make sacrifices for another, nor choosing to do something kind purely because kindness is the right thing to do, need to have any relationship whatsoever to individual relationships. Firefighters save people from burning buildings without knowing anything about them. Some people donate huge sums of money to charity and yet wish their donations to remain anonymous; that is altruism specifically [I]without[/I] individual relationships, since the donation is made in secret. I myself have tried to give aid and charity to people I have never met and will never know, because I believe it is the right thing to do, even if nobody ever knows about it. "Character is who you are in the dark." Good is about doing right by others, even if it isn't easy or comfortable to do so. Part of doing right by others is trying to understand what they want and need, and respecting them as ends in themselves, never to be seen as means to some other end. Another part is sharing what you have with those in need, even if that means you get less as a result. A further part is making sacrifices for others that are in need. Etc. These things require thought and consideration to implement wisely. They cannot be boiled down to a pithy maxim or list of singular instructions. (And, to be clear? I LOVE it when works actually put in the time to give Evil the same treatment. It's boring to make Evil boil down to "graaah, feel my unholy rage!!!!" or "what if Nazis....were ALIENS???" It's [I]so[/I] much more interesting when Evil has [I]reasons,[/I] and is trying to [I]win the argument,[/I] not just kill their debate opponent.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Muscular Neutrality (thought experiment)
Top