Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Muscular Neutrality (thought experiment)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shardstone" data-source="post: 9565139" data-attributes="member: 6807784"><p>Revisiting this concept, I think a great way to create this kind of set-up is just to establish what the consequences are if the faction doesn't exist. Doing so for evil is pretty easy; doing so for good risks falling into cliche (oh no, order is getting too orderly again!).</p><p></p><p>I think a good consequence for "Good" being too dominant is that people can really only remember their lifetimes and maybe a generation or two back. In other words, past threats get forgotten. It's not that peaceful times make for weak people, it's that peaceful times make it easy to forget what is necessary to maintain peace: strength, wisdom, vigiliance.</p><p></p><p>Such a situation may not sound too bad, at worst it may be cyclical, but that changes when you think about the scope D&D acts on. If Good gets caught slackin', then there's potential for things like extinction events -- dark gods ending the world, blobs of annihilation, great wyrms destroying civilizations, etc. So total might the destruction be that recovery will never be possible.</p><p></p><p>To that end, the neutral faction may try to create controlled scenarios in which evil is empowered so as to challenge good, and then switching to helping good overcome that evil. It is a very manipulative and morally grey set-up, and I'm sure you could make valid arguments for this status quo vs this status quo not existing. But this, IMO, is what I think is a great way to go about creating this situation of Muscular Neutrality.</p><p></p><p>The heroes finally kill the lich, only to realize that the lich was created for them to kill. Does that make the creators of the lich just as bad? Maybe worse? But now the heroes are strong, and they inspired their people, and now new heroes inspired by them will train and go out into the world. So there is a potentially a netgood. This works especially well if you have a character that is a Prophet/Diviner/Oracle in the muscular neutrality side.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shardstone, post: 9565139, member: 6807784"] Revisiting this concept, I think a great way to create this kind of set-up is just to establish what the consequences are if the faction doesn't exist. Doing so for evil is pretty easy; doing so for good risks falling into cliche (oh no, order is getting too orderly again!). I think a good consequence for "Good" being too dominant is that people can really only remember their lifetimes and maybe a generation or two back. In other words, past threats get forgotten. It's not that peaceful times make for weak people, it's that peaceful times make it easy to forget what is necessary to maintain peace: strength, wisdom, vigiliance. Such a situation may not sound too bad, at worst it may be cyclical, but that changes when you think about the scope D&D acts on. If Good gets caught slackin', then there's potential for things like extinction events -- dark gods ending the world, blobs of annihilation, great wyrms destroying civilizations, etc. So total might the destruction be that recovery will never be possible. To that end, the neutral faction may try to create controlled scenarios in which evil is empowered so as to challenge good, and then switching to helping good overcome that evil. It is a very manipulative and morally grey set-up, and I'm sure you could make valid arguments for this status quo vs this status quo not existing. But this, IMO, is what I think is a great way to go about creating this situation of Muscular Neutrality. The heroes finally kill the lich, only to realize that the lich was created for them to kill. Does that make the creators of the lich just as bad? Maybe worse? But now the heroes are strong, and they inspired their people, and now new heroes inspired by them will train and go out into the world. So there is a potentially a netgood. This works especially well if you have a character that is a Prophet/Diviner/Oracle in the muscular neutrality side. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Muscular Neutrality (thought experiment)
Top