Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Muscular Neutrality (thought experiment)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 9565582" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>No, it cannot, unless one is using the term purely metaphorically--in which case, it isn't <em>actually slavery</em>. Actual, real slavery--which is what you literally referred to it as before, up to and including saying things like "oh so I guess Good is in favor of slavery now?"--is explicitly something involuntary, enforced through threats of violence or realized violence.</p><p></p><p>"the practice or institution of holding people as chattel involuntarily and under threat of violence"</p><p>"the state of a person who is held in forced servitude"</p><p>"Slavery, bondage, servitude refer to involuntary subjection to another or others. Slavery emphasizes the idea of complete ownership and control by an owner or master: to be sold into slavery."</p><p></p><p><em>Slavery</em> is involuntary. Expecting certain kinds of labor before one is willing to provide certain kinds of credit--be it purely pecuniary credit, or the intangible credit of reputation--is simply the nature of exchange. If another person refuses to credit you with the reputation of being the best of neighbors because they do not believe your behavior has merited such credit, that is not, in any way, a reflection of that person somehow "enslaving" you to their will.</p><p></p><p>The fact that you want something specific from them--being credited with a particular kind of reputation--in no way whatsoever impinges upon them to grant it to you. Per any form of libertarian philosophy I can find (which is pretty obviously what you're applying here, whether you intend it or not), at least libertarian philosophy that actually takes its premises seriously, <em>you</em> would be the one in the wrong for demanding that others give you a reputation they did not freely and willingly assign to you themselves. All association must be voluntary. If you are not willing to partner with others in the way those others expect, that just means you don't get any benefits arising from associating with them. They don't owe you anything, not least a reputation as <em>the best of neighbors</em>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 9565582, member: 6790260"] No, it cannot, unless one is using the term purely metaphorically--in which case, it isn't [I]actually slavery[/I]. Actual, real slavery--which is what you literally referred to it as before, up to and including saying things like "oh so I guess Good is in favor of slavery now?"--is explicitly something involuntary, enforced through threats of violence or realized violence. "the practice or institution of holding people as chattel involuntarily and under threat of violence" "the state of a person who is held in forced servitude" "Slavery, bondage, servitude refer to involuntary subjection to another or others. Slavery emphasizes the idea of complete ownership and control by an owner or master: to be sold into slavery." [I]Slavery[/I] is involuntary. Expecting certain kinds of labor before one is willing to provide certain kinds of credit--be it purely pecuniary credit, or the intangible credit of reputation--is simply the nature of exchange. If another person refuses to credit you with the reputation of being the best of neighbors because they do not believe your behavior has merited such credit, that is not, in any way, a reflection of that person somehow "enslaving" you to their will. The fact that you want something specific from them--being credited with a particular kind of reputation--in no way whatsoever impinges upon them to grant it to you. Per any form of libertarian philosophy I can find (which is pretty obviously what you're applying here, whether you intend it or not), at least libertarian philosophy that actually takes its premises seriously, [I]you[/I] would be the one in the wrong for demanding that others give you a reputation they did not freely and willingly assign to you themselves. All association must be voluntary. If you are not willing to partner with others in the way those others expect, that just means you don't get any benefits arising from associating with them. They don't owe you anything, not least a reputation as [I]the best of neighbors[/I]. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Muscular Neutrality (thought experiment)
Top