Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="thalmin" data-source="post: 237776" data-attributes="member: 662">I, too, like the current themed format of Dragon. Referencing is easier. While the &quot;usefulness&quot; may seem to be less than 2 years ago, remember that when 3E first came out, everything was new and we devoured all the magazine could offer. Now we want more, but all the general stuff has been covered. It's harder to please everyone because we have all gone in different directions with our games. So as customers we want more on high level, low level, FR, new settings, generic settings, city settings, wilderness settings, dungeon settings, underwater settings, etc. All the while the editors must put out a magazine for the new and experienced players and DM's.Personally, I think they are doing a great job. No, I don't read every article. Some doesn't fit my game. Not everything can fit everyone's game. I use what I can, read what appeals to me, and eagerly await each new issue.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="thalmin, post: 237776, member: 662"] I, too, like the current themed format of Dragon. Referencing is easier. While the "usefulness" may seem to be less than 2 years ago, remember that when 3E first came out, everything was new and we devoured all the magazine could offer. Now we want more, but all the general stuff has been covered. It's harder to please everyone because we have all gone in different directions with our games. So as customers we want more on high level, low level, FR, new settings, generic settings, city settings, wilderness settings, dungeon settings, underwater settings, etc. All the while the editors must put out a magazine for the new and experienced players and DM's. Personally, I think they are doing a great job. No, I don't read every article. Some doesn't fit my game. Not everything can fit everyone's game. I use what I can, read what appeals to me, and eagerly await each new issue. [/QUOTE]

Verification