Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Arnwyn" data-source="post: 3796373" data-attributes="member: 7701">No idea what the difference is between these two options. Weird.Of course, this whole thread and poll are flawed. Ignoring for the moment that the &quot;rules bloat&quot; people and heavy purchasers are not necessarily the same people (and certainly no evidence given that they're the same), it completely ignores the fact that, you know, there are other people involved in a game. Huh. What do we get? Conflict! Those pesky players.Ignoring group dynamics (a fatal flaw seen all too often in discussions at ENWorld) will result in a flawed analysis and conclusion. One person (the DM or otherwise) not wanting &quot;rules bloat&quot; does not prevent &quot;rules bloat&quot;.Nope, not at all - because I have. I guess we just hang out in different threads. (In fact, the &quot;My players want x but I don't!&quot; are my favorite threads, simply because I love rubbernecking at trainwrecks.)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Arnwyn, post: 3796373, member: 7701"] No idea what the difference is between these two options. Weird. Of course, this whole thread and poll are flawed. Ignoring for the moment that the "rules bloat" people and heavy purchasers are not necessarily the same people (and certainly no evidence given that they're the same), it completely ignores the fact that, you know, there are [i]other people[/i] involved in a game. Huh. What do we get? Conflict! Those pesky players. Ignoring group dynamics (a fatal flaw seen all too often in discussions at ENWorld) will result in a flawed analysis and conclusion. One person (the DM or otherwise) not wanting "rules bloat" does not prevent "rules bloat". Nope, not at all - because I have. I guess we just hang out in different threads. (In fact, the "My players want x but I don't!" are my favorite threads, simply because I love rubbernecking at trainwrecks.) [/QUOTE]

Verification