Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
My 3.5 House Rules Codex – Final
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hawken" data-source="post: 5064740" data-attributes="member: 23619"><p>Nonsi, regarding your 'finger pointing' nonsense, I don't call it like I see it, I call it like it is. And there's nothing wrong with finger pointing when its done to point out obvious flaws, mistakes, invalid points, etc.. I'm the last person on this entire forum to fall in line with any PC bull crap. And you have yet to deny or refute any of that finger pointing I did. Show me where any of those are wrong.</p><p></p><p>You admit (maybe sarcastically, but for the sake of this point, I'll go with genuinely) that you don't understand the book. If you don't understand something you cannot offer any valid criticism or complaint of it, and you especially can't offer any reasonable fixes. What you're doing is like saying Shakespeare sucks but you've got an idea for a better story after you've only read the Cliff Notes and not the actual material. </p><p></p><p>Didn't state that. But like I mentioned above, you have no valid disagreement on a subject you don't understand. If you don't understand something, disagreeing with it or calling it wrong is an emotional response, subjective, and thus neither objective nor logical. If you need an example of how worthless subjective opinions are when it comes to facts, watch just about anything on MSNBC and you'll get the idea. </p><p></p><p>I didn't respond to all of your points because many of them were covered already and you're just stubbornly refusing to acknowledge the information in front of you and how it can be applied to your games. You accuse the authors of not providing enough information and seem to hold some contempt for them writing a book not up to your standards (whatever those may be), but your opinion is in the very tiny minority in that regard, for you and your hundreds of people that don't get it are vastly outnumbered by the thousands that do. If you need help understanding the books, find someone that does understand and ask them to explain it. That's not what this forum is for. Neither is this a forum for whining or complaining about the authors of 3rd edition because their material is not to your satisfaction. </p><p></p><p>Until you get the gist of the 3.5 rules, any house rule you create is innately flawed by your incomplete understanding of what it is you're trying to fix or improve.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hawken, post: 5064740, member: 23619"] Nonsi, regarding your 'finger pointing' nonsense, I don't call it like I see it, I call it like it is. And there's nothing wrong with finger pointing when its done to point out obvious flaws, mistakes, invalid points, etc.. I'm the last person on this entire forum to fall in line with any PC bull crap. And you have yet to deny or refute any of that finger pointing I did. Show me where any of those are wrong. You admit (maybe sarcastically, but for the sake of this point, I'll go with genuinely) that you don't understand the book. If you don't understand something you cannot offer any valid criticism or complaint of it, and you especially can't offer any reasonable fixes. What you're doing is like saying Shakespeare sucks but you've got an idea for a better story after you've only read the Cliff Notes and not the actual material. Didn't state that. But like I mentioned above, you have no valid disagreement on a subject you don't understand. If you don't understand something, disagreeing with it or calling it wrong is an emotional response, subjective, and thus neither objective nor logical. If you need an example of how worthless subjective opinions are when it comes to facts, watch just about anything on MSNBC and you'll get the idea. I didn't respond to all of your points because many of them were covered already and you're just stubbornly refusing to acknowledge the information in front of you and how it can be applied to your games. You accuse the authors of not providing enough information and seem to hold some contempt for them writing a book not up to your standards (whatever those may be), but your opinion is in the very tiny minority in that regard, for you and your hundreds of people that don't get it are vastly outnumbered by the thousands that do. If you need help understanding the books, find someone that does understand and ask them to explain it. That's not what this forum is for. Neither is this a forum for whining or complaining about the authors of 3rd edition because their material is not to your satisfaction. Until you get the gist of the 3.5 rules, any house rule you create is innately flawed by your incomplete understanding of what it is you're trying to fix or improve. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
My 3.5 House Rules Codex – Final
Top