Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="PeelSeel2" data-source="post: 4097058" data-attributes="member: 35016">It's a deeply intellectual thing to discuss too. 1-1-1 or 1-2-1.&nbsp; It's almost better than actually playing the game.&nbsp; And it affects so much in the game besides the obvious:&nbsp; movement, slide, push, pull, and shift.&nbsp; If I say to to one of my players &quot;Hey Roger, slide the Cheeto's over&quot; I have said the wrong thing, because a slide could go in any direction.&nbsp; Layer my misuse of a term, Roger want to taunt me with sliding the bag away from me,&nbsp; and us playing with either one of the complicated movement octagonal squared note equivalence's 1-1-2-1-23-1 or 1-1-10-100, and I could have a real problem.&nbsp; I might have to spend a standard action to get the bag pushed back at me (&quot;Thanks *&amp;% for sliding it away from me.&nbsp; Hey John, could I get you to push that bag towards me?), and depending on which type of movement system I used, it might not make it because their is diagonal movement involved.&nbsp; I might have to wait for my initiative to come back up to get John to push the bag some more for me so it is in my reach.&nbsp; In the meantime, Terry has just become away of Cheeto's on the table and has beat me in initiative order;&nbsp; and he has reach.&nbsp; I may never get the Cheetos now.This issue affects millions of gamers.&nbsp; If you elect me Presidente Rules Lawyery, I promise to look deeply into the issue and bring a law suit against WOTC for confussing the situation for even suggesting blah movement in the first place.&nbsp; Either Movement system is so War gamist and WOWish.&nbsp; On behalf of you, my constituents, I would propose an alternate movement system that is more accurate and will end all controversy, finally.&nbsp; It is, drum roll please........1-1.15-1-1.85.&nbsp; It takes care the realistic extra reach problem with reach 2 or 3 in a 1-1-1 or 1-2-1 environment.&nbsp; Brilliant!!&nbsp; And I thought of that without a Guiness!!&nbsp; I'm on a roll!!&nbsp; The Rouse, if you are out their, YOU ARE ON NOTICE!!!&nbsp; I'm gunning for your job.&nbsp; When your peers see the simple brilliance of my 1-1.15-1-1.85, you are outta their!&nbsp; Errr, how much does a new lead designer on 4e make?&nbsp; Also I want to talk with Bill about some other minor changes before print.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="PeelSeel2, post: 4097058, member: 35016"] It's a deeply intellectual thing to discuss too. 1-1-1 or 1-2-1. It's almost better than actually playing the game. And it affects so much in the game besides the obvious: movement, slide, push, pull, and shift. If I say to to one of my players "Hey Roger, slide the Cheeto's over" I have said the wrong thing, because a slide could go in any direction. Layer my misuse of a term, Roger want to taunt me with sliding the bag away from me, and us playing with either one of the complicated movement octagonal squared note equivalence's 1-1-2-1-23-1 or 1-1-10-100, and I could have a real problem. I might have to spend a standard action to get the bag pushed back at me ("Thanks *&% for sliding it away from me. Hey John, could I get you to push that bag towards me?), and depending on which type of movement system I used, it might not make it because their is diagonal movement involved. I might have to wait for my initiative to come back up to get John to push the bag some more for me so it is in my reach. In the meantime, Terry has just become away of Cheeto's on the table and has beat me in initiative order; and he has reach. I may never get the Cheetos now. This issue affects millions of gamers. If you elect me Presidente Rules Lawyery, I promise to look deeply into the issue and bring a law suit against WOTC for confussing the situation for even suggesting blah movement in the first place. Either Movement system is so War gamist and WOWish. On behalf of you, my constituents, I would propose an alternate movement system that is more accurate and will end all controversy, finally. It is, drum roll please........ 1-1.15-1-1.85. It takes care the realistic extra reach problem with reach 2 or 3 in a 1-1-1 or 1-2-1 environment. Brilliant!! And I thought of that without a Guiness!! I'm on a roll!! The Rouse, if you are out their, YOU ARE ON NOTICE!!! I'm gunning for your job. When your peers see the simple brilliance of my 1-1.15-1-1.85, you are outta their! Errr, how much does a new lead designer on 4e make? Also I want to talk with Bill about some other minor changes before print. [/QUOTE]

Verification